From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/4] ipc/mqueue: correct mq_attr_ok test
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 12:34:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120501123430.63f4bf85.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4a62cbda48cf31ca796f37fa8904f314f643db57.1335894230.git.dledford@redhat.com>
On Tue, 1 May 2012 13:50:53 -0400
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> wrote:
> While working on the other parts of the mqueue stuff, I noticed that
> the calculation for overflow in mq_attr_ok didn't actually match
> reality (this is especially true since my last patch which changed
> how we account memory slightly).
Please cc Manfred on mqueue things? He still watches ;)
> In particular, we used to test for overflow using:
> msgs * msgsize + msgs * sizeof(struct msg_msg *)
>
> That was never really correct because each message we allocate via
> load_msg() is actually a struct msg_msg followed by the data for
> the message (and if struct msg_msg + data exceeds PAGE_SIZE we end
> up allocating struct msg_msgseg structs too, but accounting for them
> would get really tedious, so let's ignore those...they're only a
> pointer in size anyway). This patch updates the calculation to be
> more accurate in regards to maximum possible memory consumption by the
> mqueue.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/ipc/mqueue.c
> +++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
>
> ...
>
> @@ -684,8 +686,11 @@ static int mq_attr_ok(struct ipc_namespace *ipc_ns, struct mq_attr *attr)
> /* check for overflow */
> if (attr->mq_msgsize > ULONG_MAX/attr->mq_maxmsg)
> return 0;
> - if ((unsigned long)(attr->mq_maxmsg * (attr->mq_msgsize
> - + sizeof (struct msg_msg *))) <
> + mq_treesize = attr->mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg) +
> + min_t(unsigned int, attr->mq_maxmsg, MQ_PRIO_MAX) *
> + sizeof(struct posix_msg_tree_node);
> + if ((unsigned long)(attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize +
> + mq_treesize) <
> (unsigned long)(attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize))
> return 0;
> return 1;
That's a bit of a mouthful. Does this look OK?
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c~ipc-mqueue-correct-mq_attr_ok-test-fix
+++ a/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -672,7 +672,8 @@ static void remove_notification(struct m
static int mq_attr_ok(struct ipc_namespace *ipc_ns, struct mq_attr *attr)
{
int mq_treesize;
-
+ unsigned long total_size;
+
if (attr->mq_maxmsg <= 0 || attr->mq_msgsize <= 0)
return 0;
if (capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
@@ -690,9 +691,8 @@ static int mq_attr_ok(struct ipc_namespa
mq_treesize = attr->mq_maxmsg * sizeof(struct msg_msg) +
min_t(unsigned int, attr->mq_maxmsg, MQ_PRIO_MAX) *
sizeof(struct posix_msg_tree_node);
- if ((unsigned long)(attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize +
- mq_treesize) <
- (unsigned long)(attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize))
+ total_size = attr->mq_maxmsg * attr->mq_msgsize;
+ if (total_size + mq_treesize < total_size)
return 0;
return 1;
}
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-01 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-01 17:50 [Patch 0/4] ipc/mqueue improvements Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50 ` [Patch 1/4] ipc/mqueue: improve performance of send/recv Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50 ` [Patch 2/4] ipc/mqueue: correct mq_attr_ok test Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 19:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-05-01 19:38 ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 17:50 ` [Patch 3/4] ipc/mqueue: strengthen checks on mqueue creation Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 20:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 20:11 ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 20:18 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 23:02 ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 23:04 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-05-01 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 17:50 ` [Patch 4/4] tools/selftests: add mq_perf_tests Doug Ledford
2012-05-01 19:53 ` Andrew Morton
2012-05-01 20:14 ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-03 9:21 ` [Patch 1/4] ipc/mqueue: improve performance of send/recv Dan Carpenter
2012-05-03 13:03 ` Doug Ledford
2012-05-03 10:05 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120501123430.63f4bf85.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox