public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 14:28:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205011428.16299.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120501133429.GB23919@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1915 bytes --]

On Tuesday 01 May 2012 09:34:29 Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:26:11AM +0100, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i am strongly in favor though of agreeing on & documenting the baseline
> > API first before attempting to clean anything up.  sorry to keep harping
> > on this.
> 
> It would be nice if we could just use asm-generic/io.h as the documention,
> i.e. if you want to write a portable driver, just stick to the functions
> implemented there.

we have Documentation/DocBook/deviceiobook.tmpl where we can document what 
should be used in device drivers for portability, and what should be avoided.  
then we can refer to asm-generic/io.h for just the API level stuff (i.e. 
inputs/outputs/return values).

then we update asm-generic/io.h to:
 - refer device driver authors to deviceiobook for the higher level 
documentation
 - explicitly state that the API here is the baseline and any new functions 
should be discussed first on linux-arch/lkml
 - explicitly state what API functions have been omitted, and what should be 
used instead of those

how's that sound as a plan ?

> It would be nice if we could just use asm-generic/io.h as the documention,
> i.e. if you want to write a portable driver, just stick to the functions
> implemented there. Apart from the string accessors, I think it's already
> fairly accurate. The __raw_* functions seem to be missing on s390 but I
> don't think driver portability is a huge concern for that architecture.

as long as we document expectations at the top of the file, that's fine.  this 
implicit assumption doesn't fly in general for asm-generic/ because it's been a 
constantly increasing code base as it merges more arches.  there were a bunch 
of files/apis i extended in asm-generic/ as i converted Blackfin over to it.  
this is what we wanted from the beginning (afaik; i'm sure Arnd can correct 
me).
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-05-01 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-27 10:42 [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} string functions Will Deacon
2012-04-27 10:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] asm-generic: io: don't perform swab during {in,out} " Will Deacon
2012-04-27 12:12   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 16:18   ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 16:59     ` Will Deacon
2012-04-27 17:26       ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic: io: remove {read,write} " Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 16:17 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-27 16:53   ` Will Deacon
2012-04-27 17:18     ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-28  8:46     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-27 20:29   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 16:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 17:14   ` Will Deacon
2012-04-27 17:53     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-04-27 20:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-27 23:26         ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-01 13:34           ` Will Deacon
2012-05-01 14:40             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-01 18:28             ` Mike Frysinger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201205011428.16299.vapier@gentoo.org \
    --to=vapier@gentoo.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox