From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756322Ab2EAVmd (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 17:42:33 -0400 Received: from intermatrixgroup.ru ([195.178.208.66]:33881 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755417Ab2EAVma (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 17:42:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 01:42:19 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: omap_hdq: use wait_event_timeout to wait for read to complete. Message-ID: <20120501214219.GB15560@ioremap.net> References: <20120425124153.2afa318b@notabene.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120425124153.2afa318b@notabene.brown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:41:53PM +1000, NeilBrown (neilb@suse.de) wrote: > There is no gain in having a loop - there is no risk of missing the > interrupt with wait_event_timeout. > > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown Both patches look good, thank you Feel free to add my ack if needed -- Evgeniy Polyakov