public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
	efault@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched, fair: Let minimally loaded cpu balance the group
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:55:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502102541.GA22740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120501182610.745844312@chello.nl>

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2012-05-01 20:14:31]:

> @@ -3795,12 +3796,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
> 
>  		/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
>  		if (local_group) {
> -			if (idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu) {
> -				first_idle_cpu = 1;
> +			load = target_load(i, load_idx);
> +			if (load < balance_load || idle_cpu(i)) {
> +				balance_load = load;

Let's say load_idx != 0 (ex: a busy cpu doing this load balance). In
that case, for a idle cpu, we could return non-zero load and hence this
would fail to select such a idle cpu? IOW :

		balance_load = 0 iff idle_cpu(i) ??

>  				balance_cpu = i;
>  			}
> -
> -			load = target_load(i, load_idx);
>  		} else {
>  			load = source_load(i, load_idx);
>  			if (load > max_cpu_load) {
> 
> 

- vatsa


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-02 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-01 18:14 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] various sched and numa bits Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 18:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched, fair: Let minimally loaded cpu balance the group Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-02 10:25   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2012-05-02 10:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-02 10:34       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-05-04  0:05         ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-04 16:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 18:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched, fair: Add some serialization to the sched_domain load-balance walk Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 18:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] x86: Allow specifying node_distance() for numa=fake Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-01 18:14 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] x86: Hard partition cpu topology masks on node boundaries Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120502102541.GA22740@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox