public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:54:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120502145412.GA20058@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335930906.8274.97.camel@deadeye>

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:55:06AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:

> This validation is crap; you're not accounting for the size of the node
> or invalid lengths.  Try:

Good catch.

> Isn't this slightly too restrictive?  The '& 0xff' results in many
> non-ASCII characters aliasing hex digits and potentially causes a
> variable to be validated as if it was special.  I would think the
> correct condition is:

Mm. Yeah, I guess that should probably be permitted.

> 		if (var->VariableName[i] > 127 ||
> 		    hex_to_bin(var->VariableName[i]) < 0)
> 
> Presumably the variable should also be ignored if there are any more
> characters after the 4 hex digits?

The spec doesn't permit any such names, so I don't think it makes any 
difference in practice. But in theory, we should probably either 
explicitly permit or reject them rather than treating them as if they're 
boot variables.

> > +	/* A valid entry must be at least 6 bytes */
> > +	if (len < 6)
> > +		return false;
> 
> Surely 8 bytes - otherwise you don't even have space for the
> description's null terminator.

Yes, I guess that could trip things up.

> > +	filepathlength = buffer[4] | buffer[5] << 8;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * There's no stored length for the description, so it has to be
> > +	 * found by hand
> > +	 */
> > +	desclength = utf16_strsize((efi_char16_t *)(buffer + 6), len) + 2;
> [...]
> 
> Second argument should be len - 6.

Sure.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-02 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-30 20:11 [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add new variable attributes Matthew Garrett
2012-04-30 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables Matthew Garrett
2012-05-01  0:00   ` Shea Levy
2012-05-01  0:31     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-02  3:55   ` Ben Hutchings
2012-05-02 14:54     ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2012-04-30 22:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] efi: Add new variable attributes Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-16 13:58 Matthew Garrett
2012-02-16 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: Validate UEFI boot variables Matthew Garrett
2012-02-16 14:27   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120502145412.GA20058@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox