public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Introduce a slave mutex for serializing IO.
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 21:58:57 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503175857.GA13988@ioremap.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120502162627.50544c8b@notabene.brown>

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:26:27PM +1000, NeilBrown (neilb@suse.de) wrote:
> Take takes me back to the deadlock.
> To be precise:
>   while scanning the w1 bus - with master->mutex held - w1_attach_slave_device
>   eventually calls into bq27000_battery_probe  which calls
>     power_supply_register -> device_add -> kobject_uevent_env
> 
>   and the to get all the data for the uevent, power_supply_uevent calls
>   the get_property callback which tries to read from the w1 bus and so
>   needs the master->mutex.  Which is held.  Deadlock.
> 
> So options seems to be:
>  - drop the lock while attaching slave devices
>  - create a list of slave devices, then attach them after the bus scan has
>    finished.
>  - have device_add run the kobject_uevent in a separate task (work_queue)
>  - or maybe the following which feels ugly but is easy.  Mark the bq27000 as
>    not ready until after the power_supply_register, and if get_property is 
>    called before the device is ready, return ENODATA.
>    Simple and works.  Maybe horrible.
>    power_supply_register will have scheduled a power_supply_changed() which
>    will poll

You can check mutex owner - and if it is you who holds it, then dig into
low-level function without lock.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-25  2:49 [PATCH] w1: Introduce a slave mutex for serializing IO NeilBrown
2012-05-01 21:39 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-02  6:26   ` NeilBrown
2012-05-03 17:58     ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2012-05-03 21:08       ` NeilBrown
2012-05-03 21:27         ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-09  1:43           ` NeilBrown
2012-05-15  1:26             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-18  6:05               ` NeilBrown
2012-06-10 20:58                 ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120503175857.GA13988@ioremap.net \
    --to=zbr@ioremap.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox