From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Introduce a slave mutex for serializing IO.
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 21:58:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120503175857.GA13988@ioremap.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120502162627.50544c8b@notabene.brown>
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 04:26:27PM +1000, NeilBrown (neilb@suse.de) wrote:
> Take takes me back to the deadlock.
> To be precise:
> while scanning the w1 bus - with master->mutex held - w1_attach_slave_device
> eventually calls into bq27000_battery_probe which calls
> power_supply_register -> device_add -> kobject_uevent_env
>
> and the to get all the data for the uevent, power_supply_uevent calls
> the get_property callback which tries to read from the w1 bus and so
> needs the master->mutex. Which is held. Deadlock.
>
> So options seems to be:
> - drop the lock while attaching slave devices
> - create a list of slave devices, then attach them after the bus scan has
> finished.
> - have device_add run the kobject_uevent in a separate task (work_queue)
> - or maybe the following which feels ugly but is easy. Mark the bq27000 as
> not ready until after the power_supply_register, and if get_property is
> called before the device is ready, return ENODATA.
> Simple and works. Maybe horrible.
> power_supply_register will have scheduled a power_supply_changed() which
> will poll
You can check mutex owner - and if it is you who holds it, then dig into
low-level function without lock.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-03 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 2:49 [PATCH] w1: Introduce a slave mutex for serializing IO NeilBrown
2012-05-01 21:39 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-02 6:26 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-03 17:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2012-05-03 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-03 21:27 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-09 1:43 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-15 1:26 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2012-05-18 6:05 ` NeilBrown
2012-06-10 20:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120503175857.GA13988@ioremap.net \
--to=zbr@ioremap.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox