From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.4-rc3] MTD: NAND: ams-delta: Fix request_mem_region() failure
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:11:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504171125.GD5613@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520744.9xCxNUdyzk@acer>
Hi,
* Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl> [120430 11:15]:
> Dnia czwartek, 26 kwietnia 2012 08:20:59 Artem Bityutskiy pisze:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 19:01 +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Both drivers use separate subsets of registers that belong to the
> OMAP1
> > > MPU I/O device, but are used for controlling different sets of I/O
> pins.
> > > The NAND driver reads/writes the folowing registers:
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_INPUT_LATCH,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_OUTPUT,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_IO_CNTL,
> > > while the keypad driver - the following:
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBR_LATCH,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBC,
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_KBD_MASKIT
> > > - OMAP_MPUIO_GPIO_DEBOUNCING.
> > > Both subsets are non-overlapping, and we rely on the drivers being
> free
> > > of bugs and doing their job correctly, not stepping on each others'
> > > feet, I guess.
> >
> > First of all, I think this information should be in the commit
> message.
> > Also, some sort of comment in the driver code would be nice.
> >
> > If locking the memory region is too coarse approach, the should have a
> > small separate omap-specific MPUIO subsystem which will be used by
> > drivers to access MPUIO?
> >
> > Another question - should request_mem_region() be also removed from
> the
> > omap-gpio driver then? I think it is more sensible to put a comment
> > there that it is sharing MPIO with other drivers, instead of having
> an
> > illusion of exclusive memory region ownership.
> >
> > But this is up to the OMAP community - I can take this patch to my
> > l2-mtd tree if you get an ack from Tony or other OMAP guys.
>
> Tony,
> Would I get your Ack for this fix if I extend the commit message as Artem
> suggested? If not, what do you think should be a correct way to fix the
> regression?
Well how about adding some exported functions to drivers/gpio/gpio_omap.c
like omap_mpuio_latch?
For the regression fix, if you guys want to do what Janusz is suggesting,
then assuming the patch description also contains some decent long term
plan to properly fix it:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 13:49 [PATCH v3.4-rc3] MTD: NAND: ams-delta: Fix request_mem_region() failure Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-04-25 15:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-25 17:01 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-04-26 5:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-30 18:09 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-05-04 17:11 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-05-04 19:23 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-05-07 20:51 ` [PATCH v2 3.4-rc6] MTD: NAND: ams-delta: fix " Janusz Krzysztofik
2012-05-08 7:03 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-08 7:11 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-05-08 18:46 ` Janusz Krzysztofik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120504171125.GD5613@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jkrzyszt@tis.icnet.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).