From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] perf, tool: Fix endian issues
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 20:08:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504180800.GD2995@m.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504175940.GC29365@infradead.org>
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:59:40PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:40:17AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 5/4/12 11:11 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >hi,
> > >sending fixies to properly handle perf.data endians.
> > >
> > >v2 changes:
> > > - added patches 3 and 4 to handle sample_id_all header endianity
> > >
> > >Attached patches:
> > > 1/4 perf, tool: Handle different endians properly during symbol load
> > > 2/4 perf, tool: Carry perf_event_attr bitfield throught different endians
> > > 3/4 perf, tool: Handle endianity swap on sample_id_all header data
> > > 4/4 perf, tool: Fix 32 bit values endianity swap for sample_id_all header
> >
> > Have you tested these patches by collecting data on PPC (or other
> > big endian) and analyzing on Intel x86 and vice versa?
>
> I think so, but indeed it is good practice to show the sequence made to
> test the changes, with sample, short command output before and after.
>
> - Arnaldo
yep, I should have mentioned that..
I did following testing with x86_64 and ppc64:
1. perf record -a -- sleep 10
2. perf report > report.origin
3. perf archive perf.data
4. copy the perf.data.tar.bz2 to a target system
5. tar xjvf perf.data.tar.bz2 -C ~/.debug
6. perf report > report.target
7. diff -u report.origin report.target
the diff should produce no output
hm, I did jsut x86_64 record and ppc64 report.. will do also
the other way around and resend with updated changelog
thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-04 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 17:11 [PATCHv2 0/4] perf, tool: Fix endian issues Jiri Olsa
2012-05-04 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf, tool: Handle different endians properly during symbol load Jiri Olsa
2012-05-04 17:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf, tool: Carry perf_event_attr bitfield throught different endians Jiri Olsa
2012-05-04 17:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf, tool: Handle endianity swap on sample_id_all header data Jiri Olsa
2012-05-04 17:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf, tool: Fix 32 bit values endianity swap for sample_id_all header Jiri Olsa
2012-05-04 17:40 ` [PATCHv2 0/4] perf, tool: Fix endian issues David Ahern
2012-05-04 17:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-04 18:08 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120504180800.GD2995@m.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox