From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use struct perf_error_ops
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 10:40:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507084015.GL16608@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zk9kqtwh.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
* Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 7 May 2012 10:10:51 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:31:28 +0300 (EEST), Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >> >> Define and use perf_gtk_eops to provide a GTK2 message
> >> >> dialog for error reporting. To do that, we need global
> >> >> main_window variable for tracking UI state.
> >> >>
> >> > I think this is an usability glitch waiting to happen - especially so if
> >> > you use it for warnings. There's no reason to require the user to react to
> >> > warning messages in the GUI because there's absolutely nothing they can do
> >> > about them.
> >> >
> >> > I guess we could do something like the "ui helpline" thing used by the
> >> > newt front-end if we really wanted to.
> >> >
> >> > Pekka
> >>
> >> I did quick grep on ui__warning and found that most of its
> >> users are trying to show the messages before exiting. I think
> >> some (at least) of them can be converted to ui__error(). And
> >> as existing implementation (TUI) already requires user input
> >> for this, I thought it's ok.
> >>
> >> But I agreed with you that ui__warning should not be used for
> >> showing non-critical messages and converted to helpline-style
> >> ones.
> >
> > If they are in essence ui__error() already then please convert
> > them to ui__error() instead of perpetuating the mistake - don't
> > force annoying pop-ups for warnings that may or may not be
> > fatal. Spurious pop-ups are sad and people hate them.
> >
>
> Ok, will do that in another patch (series). So you mean
> ui__warning should not be a pop-up dialog, right?
Pekka, is that what you meant too?
If there are *real* warnings that are not followed up by some
fatal close of the application then those should probably be
displayed in some sort of unintrusive manner - a scrolling list
of events, a small status display box that can be clicked on if
people get curious, etc.
Small, well-thought out details like that are nice in a GUI.
Create enough of them and people start not to hate the app
(people generally hate computers, so GUIs have an uphill
struggle). Break a critical mass and people will actively love
the app.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 4:55 [PATCH 0/7] perf ui: Add basic error handling for GTK2 front-end Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf ui: Make setup_browser() generic Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:33 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf ui: Drop arg[cv] arguments from perf_gtk_setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:34 ` [tip:perf/core] perf ui gtk: " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 3/7] perf ui/gtk: Rename functions for consistency Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:35 ` [tip:perf/core] perf ui gtk: " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 4/7] perf ui: Add gtk2 support into setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:36 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 5/7] perf ui: Change fallback policy of setup_browser() Namhyung Kim
2012-05-11 6:37 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 6/7] perf ui: Introduce struct perf_error_ops Namhyung Kim
2012-05-02 19:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-05-03 14:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 4:55 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use " Namhyung Kim
2012-04-30 6:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-04-30 8:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-07 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-07 8:26 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-05-07 8:40 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-29 4:22 [PATCH 0/7] perf ui: Add basic error handling for GTK2 front-end (v3) Namhyung Kim
2012-05-29 4:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] perf ui/gtk: Use struct perf_error_ops Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507084015.GL16608@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox