From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: drivers: Probable misuses of ||
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:34:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120507163400.GL17002@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336407634.18931.5.camel@joe2Laptop>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:36 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > with no analysis
> You did elide the "Likely the || should be &&" preface.
By analysis I meant something like "...because X".
> > Compare this with the reports from people like Julia Lawall, for example
> > - they tend to be very clear. Even simply adding "...as with || they
> > will always be true" would've helped.
> I think it's a pretty basic logic error that most all
> lkml readers should be able to identify most of the time.
"Can spot" and "will spot" are two different things; speaking as someone
on the receiving end of lots of mails it does make a big difference.
Cues in the human written text which show someone thought about the
problem help a lot with catching attention - the more effort it takes to
understand a mail the more likely it is to get skipped, especially if
there's no patch.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-07 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 23:00 drivers: Probable misuses of || Joe Perches
2012-05-04 21:54 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-04 22:02 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-04 22:09 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-04 22:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-05 16:00 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-05-07 8:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-07 16:20 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-07 16:34 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-04 22:56 ` Alan Cox
2012-05-04 23:13 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-04 22:45 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-05-07 10:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-05-07 15:22 ` [PATCH] re: drivers: Probable misuses of || - it913x.c Malcolm Priestley
2012-05-07 11:04 ` drivers: Probable misuses of || Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120507163400.GL17002@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox