From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751680Ab2EHJCK (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 05:02:10 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:51532 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093Ab2EHJCI (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 05:02:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 14:20:02 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Ingo Molnar Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for uprobes Message-ID: <20120508085002.GA13272@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20120409091133.8343.65289.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20120409091154.8343.50489.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20120411103043.GB29437@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120508041229.GD30652@gmail.com> <1336465808.16236.13.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1336465808.16236.13.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12050809-2398-0000-0000-000006741700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra [2012-05-08 10:30:08]: > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest > > uprobes patches: > > > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS) > > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo? I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th. Ingo, Since you had asked me to send the patch series again after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. At that time, I had handled this change as part of a comment from Stephen Boyd. I had mentioned this in the changelog. Would it be possible for you to accept the patches from https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/16/109 with message id: Message-Id: <20120416091936.19174.2641.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> Currently you seem to have picked from https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/11/117 -- Thanks and Regards Srikar