From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752657Ab2EHJa5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 05:30:57 -0400 Received: from e38.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.159]:51615 "EHLO e38.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751113Ab2EHJa4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 05:30:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 14:49:42 +0530 From: Srikar Dronamraju To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Jim Keniston , LKML , Linux-mm , Oleg Nesterov , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , Steven Rostedt , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Anton Arapov Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 3/3] tracing: Provide trace events interface for uprobes Message-ID: <20120508091942.GB13272@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srikar Dronamraju References: <20120409091133.8343.65289.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20120409091154.8343.50489.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> <20120411103043.GB29437@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120508041229.GD30652@gmail.com> <1336465808.16236.13.camel@twins> <20120508085002.GA13272@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120508092041.GE27323@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120508092041.GE27323@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12050809-5518-0000-0000-0000043B19C0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ingo Molnar [2012-05-08 11:20:41]: > > * Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > > * Peter Zijlstra [2012-05-08 10:30:08]: > > > > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 06:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > FYI, this warning started to trigger in -tip, with the latest > > > > uprobes patches: > > > > > > > > warning: (UPROBE_EVENT) selects UPROBES which has unmet direct dependencies (UPROBE_EVENTS && PERF_EVENTS) > > > > > > this looks to be the only UPROBE_EVENTS instance, is that a typo? > > > > > > I think I corrected this in the latest posting I sent on April 16th. > > > > Ingo, > > > > Since you had asked me to send the patch series again > > after handling comments and acks, I had sent the set. [...] > > Mind sending a delta patch instead? The patches are now > reasonably well tested and don't seem to break in any functional > way, so unless the delta patch is really ugly we should try that > instead of rebasing the branch. > Okay .. will send the delta patch now -- Thanks and Regards Srikar