* [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl-regulator: define all feature flags in one place.
2012-05-08 19:43 [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable NeilBrown
@ 2012-05-08 19:43 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-08 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: twl-regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable NeilBrown
2012-05-09 9:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: " Mark Brown
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-05-08 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: linux-kernel, NeilBrown
twl-regulator has a collection of feature flags, some defined
in twl-core.c and one defined in i2c/twl.h.
This is confusing for anyone adding a new feature flag.
So collect them together and place them in twl.h immediately
after the structure in which they are initially set.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 7 -------
include/linux/i2c/twl.h | 8 ++++++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
index 7c2267e..6fc90be 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
@@ -224,13 +224,6 @@
#define HIGH_PERF_SQ (1 << 3)
#define CK32K_LOWPWR_EN (1 << 7)
-
-/* chip-specific feature flags, for i2c_device_id.driver_data */
-#define TWL4030_VAUX2 BIT(0) /* pre-5030 voltage ranges */
-#define TPS_SUBSET BIT(1) /* tps659[23]0 have fewer LDOs */
-#define TWL5031 BIT(2) /* twl5031 has different registers */
-#define TWL6030_CLASS BIT(3) /* TWL6030 class */
-
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/* is driver active, bound to a chip? */
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
index 1f90de0..d1afedc 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
@@ -171,8 +171,6 @@ static inline int twl_class_is_ ##class(void) \
TWL_CLASS_IS(4030, TWL4030_CLASS_ID)
TWL_CLASS_IS(6030, TWL6030_CLASS_ID)
-#define TWL6025_SUBCLASS BIT(4) /* TWL6025 has changed registers */
-
/*
* Read and write single 8-bit registers
*/
@@ -746,6 +744,12 @@ struct twl_regulator_driver_data {
void *data;
unsigned long features;
};
+/* chip-specific feature flags, for twl_regulator_driver_data.features */
+#define TWL4030_VAUX2 BIT(0) /* pre-5030 voltage ranges */
+#define TPS_SUBSET BIT(1) /* tps659[23]0 have fewer LDOs */
+#define TWL5031 BIT(2) /* twl5031 has different registers */
+#define TWL6030_CLASS BIT(3) /* TWL6030 class */
+#define TWL6025_SUBCLASS BIT(4) /* TWL6025 has changed registers */
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] regulator: twl-regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable.
2012-05-08 19:43 [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable NeilBrown
2012-05-08 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl-regulator: define all feature flags in one place NeilBrown
@ 2012-05-08 19:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-05-09 9:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: " Mark Brown
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-05-08 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: linux-kernel, NeilBrown
The regulators in the twl4030 can provide some voltage settings
that are not offically supported.
These settings are disabled by default, but can be enabled with
CONFIG_TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED=y
However
- that config variable is not mentioned in any Kconfig so cannot
be used, and
- a global setting is clumsy - a per regulator setting would be
better.
So define a new 'feature' flag that a board file can set to enable
these unsupported volatages for boards which need them.
This flag cannot (yet) be set using device-tree.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 10 ++++------
include/linux/i2c/twl.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
index fffacb4..c739071 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
@@ -395,14 +395,12 @@ static int twl6030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
* VAUX3 at 3V is incorrectly listed in some TI manuals as unsupported.
* TI are revising the twl5030/tps659x0 specs to support that 3.0V setting.
*/
-#ifdef CONFIG_TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED
-#define UNSUP_MASK 0x0000
-#else
#define UNSUP_MASK 0x8000
-#endif
#define UNSUP(x) (UNSUP_MASK | (x))
-#define IS_UNSUP(x) (UNSUP_MASK & (x))
+#define IS_UNSUP(info, x) \
+ ((UNSUP_MASK & (x)) && \
+ !((info)->features & TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED))
#define LDO_MV(x) (~UNSUP_MASK & (x))
@@ -476,7 +474,7 @@ static int twl4030ldo_list_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned index)
struct twlreg_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
int mV = info->table[index];
- return IS_UNSUP(mV) ? 0 : (LDO_MV(mV) * 1000);
+ return IS_UNSUP(info, mV) ? 0 : (LDO_MV(mV) * 1000);
}
static int
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
index d1afedc..3993477 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h
@@ -750,6 +750,11 @@ struct twl_regulator_driver_data {
#define TWL5031 BIT(2) /* twl5031 has different registers */
#define TWL6030_CLASS BIT(3) /* TWL6030 class */
#define TWL6025_SUBCLASS BIT(4) /* TWL6025 has changed registers */
+#define TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED BIT(5) /* Some voltages are possible
+ * but not officially supported.
+ * This flag is necessary to
+ * enable them.
+ */
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable.
2012-05-08 19:43 [PATCH 0/2] MFD/regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable NeilBrown
2012-05-08 19:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] MFD: twl-regulator: define all feature flags in one place NeilBrown
2012-05-08 19:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: twl-regulator: make TWL4030_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED more configurable NeilBrown
@ 2012-05-09 9:09 ` Mark Brown
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-09 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown; +Cc: Liam Girdwood, Samuel Ortiz, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 237 bytes --]
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 05:43:59AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> This is a resend, rebased on linux-next (next-20120508) which
> simplifies the second patch slightly.
Applied both after fixing up the changelog for the first patch slightly.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread