From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, luto@mit.edu, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
avi@redhat.com, johnstul@us.ibm.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [x86]: Improve secondary CPU bring-up process robustness
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 15:12:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509131258.GA24979@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336555184.2527.6.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how far along he is, but it would be
> awesome if you could help him out somehow.
bits of Thomas's rework are in latest -tip, the tip:smp/hotplug
branch, also merged into tip:master and soon to linux-next.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 10:24 [PATCH 0/5] [x86]: Improve secondary CPU bring-up process robustness Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-09 12:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-10 17:31 ` Rob Landley
2012-05-10 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-09 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] Fix soft-lookup in stop machine on secondary cpu bring up Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 15:04 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-09 15:22 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 15:34 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-10 15:26 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-10 16:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-10 16:38 ` Shuah Khan
2012-05-11 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-11 15:16 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-11 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-12 19:32 ` [RFC] [x86]: abort secondary cpu bringup gracefully Igor Mammedov
2012-05-12 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-12 18:51 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-14 11:09 ` [RFC v2] " Igor Mammedov
2012-05-24 15:41 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-25 18:11 ` Rob Landley
2012-05-30 16:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] Take in account that several cpus might call check_tsc_sync_* at the same time Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] Do not wait till next cpu online and abort early if lead cpu do not wait for us anymore Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] Cancel secondary CPU bringup if boot cpu abandoned this effort Igor Mammedov
2012-05-09 10:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] Do not mark cpu as not present if we failed to boot it Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509131258.GA24979@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).