linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vsmp: Fix number of CPUs when vsmp is disabled
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 17:44:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509154448.GD2653@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336552121-6742-1-git-send-email-ido@wizery.com>


* Ido Yariv <ido@wizery.com> wrote:

> +static void __init vsmp_cap_cpus(void)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *address;
> +	unsigned int cfg, topology, node_shift, maxcpus;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
> +	/* VSMP is enabled, no need to cap cpus */
> +	return;
> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +	/*
> +	 * CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not configured, so limit the number CPUs to the

I suspect this will throw compiler warnings in the 
CONFIG_X86_VSMP && !CONFIG_SMP case.

Why not do something like:

static void __init vsmp_cap_cpus(void)
{
#if !defined(CONFIG_X86_VSMP) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
   ...
#endif
}

This keeps the #ifdef complexity reasonably concentrated.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-06 12:39 [PATCH 1/2] vsmp: Fix number of CPUs when vsmp is disabled Ido Yariv
2012-04-06 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] vsmp: Ignore IOAPIC IRQ affinity if possible Ido Yariv
2012-04-16  7:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vsmp: Fix number of CPUs when vsmp is disabled Ido Yariv
2012-04-16  7:39     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] vsmp: Ignore IOAPIC IRQ affinity if possible Ido Yariv
2012-05-07 13:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-08  0:53         ` Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)
2012-05-09  9:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-09 21:21             ` Ido Yariv
2012-06-02 22:11               ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Introduce apic post-initialization callback Ido Yariv
2012-06-02 22:11                 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] vsmp: Ignore IOAPIC IRQ affinity if possible Ido Yariv
2012-06-06 15:02                   ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/vsmp: " tip-bot for Ravikiran Thirumalai
2012-06-08  8:52                     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-08 15:43                       ` Ido Yariv
2012-06-11  8:58                         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-11 19:41                           ` Ido Yariv
2012-06-14 10:51                             ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-14 15:43                               ` [PATCH] x86/vsmp: Fix linker error when CONFIG_PROC_FS is not set Ido Yariv
2012-06-15 14:22                                 ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for Ido Yariv
2012-06-06 15:01                 ` [tip:x86/platform] x86/platform: Introduce APIC post-initialization callback tip-bot for Ido Yariv
2012-06-14 17:34                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-15 14:33                     ` Ido Yariv
2012-04-28 21:33     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] vsmp: Fix number of CPUs when vsmp is disabled Ido Yariv
2012-04-29  3:05       ` Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)
2012-05-07 13:24     ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-08  7:34       ` [PATCH v3] " Ido Yariv
2012-05-08 10:05         ` [tip:x86/platform] " tip-bot for Shai Fultheim
2012-05-08 12:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-09  8:03             ` Ido Yariv
2012-05-09  8:22               ` Ido Yariv
2012-05-09  8:28                 ` [PATCH v4] " Ido Yariv
2012-05-09 15:44                   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-09 15:55                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-11 19:26                       ` Ido Yariv
2012-05-12  1:20                         ` Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)
2012-05-09  9:12               ` [tip:x86/platform] " Ingo Molnar
2012-05-09 15:27                 ` Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120509154448.GD2653@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ido@wizery.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=shai@scalemp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).