linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suresh@aristanetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86, xsave: remove thread_has_fpu() bug check in __sanitize_i387_state()
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 22:30:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509203047.GA334@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336519085-27450-3-git-send-email-suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

Hi Suresh,

I can't really comment this series, my understanding of this code
is too limited.

But could you explain this patch? I am just curious.

On 05/08, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> BUG_ON() in __sanitize_i387_state() is checking that the fpu state
> is not live any more. But for preempt kernels, task can be scheduled
> out and in at any place and the preload_fpu logic during context switch
> can make the fpu registers live again.

And? Do you see any particular scenario when this BUG_ON() is wrong?

Afaics, __sanitize_i387_state() should not be called if the task can
be scheduled in with ->fpu_counter != 0.

> Similarly during core dump, thread dumping the core can schedule out
> and in for page-allocations etc in non-preempt case.

Again, can't understand. The core-dumping thread does init_fpu()
before it calls sanitize_i387_state().

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 19:07 [PATCH 1/2] coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper multi-threaded core dump Suresh Siddha
2012-05-07 19:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, xsave: remove thread_has_fpu() bug check in __sanitize_i387_state() Suresh Siddha
2012-05-07 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper multi-threaded core dump Linus Torvalds
2012-05-07 20:09   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-08 23:18     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-08 23:18       ` [PATCH 1/3] " Suresh Siddha
2012-05-09 21:05         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-09 21:32           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 16:55             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-10 17:04               ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-10 23:33                 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fork: move the real prepare_to_copy() users to arch_dup_task_struct() Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 23:33                   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] coredump: ensure the fpu state is flushed for proper multi-threaded core dump Suresh Siddha
2012-05-11 16:51                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-11 19:05                       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-13 16:11                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-15 18:03                           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-15 18:55                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-17  0:17                     ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 23:33                   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, xsave: remove thread_has_fpu() bug check in __sanitize_i387_state() Suresh Siddha
2012-05-17  0:18                     ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 23:33                   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86, fpu: drop the fpu state during thread exit Suresh Siddha
2012-05-17  0:19                     ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-05-11  0:17                   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] fork: move the real prepare_to_copy() users to arch_dup_task_struct() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-17  0:16                   ` [tip:x86/fpu] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 23:48                 ` [PATCH 1/3] coredump: flush the fpu exit state for proper multi-threaded core dump Suresh Siddha
2012-05-08 23:18       ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, xsave: remove thread_has_fpu() bug check in __sanitize_i387_state() Suresh Siddha
2012-05-09 20:30         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-05-09 21:18           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-10 16:36             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-05-08 23:18       ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, fpu: clear the fpu state during thread exit Suresh Siddha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120509203047.GA334@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=suresh@aristanetworks.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).