From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761314Ab2EIX5a (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 19:57:30 -0400 Received: from kandzendo.ru ([195.178.208.66]:45771 "EHLO tservice.net.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969Ab2EIX53 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 19:57:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 03:57:23 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov To: Markus Franke Cc: Greg KH , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] w1: Add 1-wire slave device driver for DS28E04-100 Message-ID: <20120509235723.GA7404@ioremap.net> References: <20120430021300.GA18148@kroah.com> <4FA1953B.40008@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <20120502202134.GB26628@kroah.com> <20120503180056.GB13988@ioremap.net> <4FAAD584.70102@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <20120509220636.GA27659@kroah.com> <4FAAECB7.8070904@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> <20120509222411.GA24302@kroah.com> <4FAAF1C4.2050500@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FAAF1C4.2050500@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:37:56AM +0200, Markus Franke (markus.franke@s2002.tu-chemnitz.de) wrote: > Well, the data read/written through this file is actually directly > "passed" on to the device. There are two bits which reflect the current > state of the PIO pins of the DS28E04. However, I must admit that this > could also be implemented as regular sysfs attributes. Greg, could you please describe what is exactly wrong with binary sysfs file? Or am I missing that it is not usual sysfs file but some special stuff? -- Evgeniy Polyakov