From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759889Ab2EKNWo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 09:22:44 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:54261 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759816Ab2EKNWh (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2012 09:22:37 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Roland Stigge Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v8] gpio: Device tree support for LPC32xx Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:22:14 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.4.0-rc3; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Grant Likely , arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com, srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com References: <1336679838-30738-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <201205111219.10025.arnd@arndb.de> <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> In-Reply-To: <4FAD0A79.8040207@antcom.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205111322.15191.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:wtKuVUf8v/UY8Zo+Sowtje+InQVmiYvZZjJ+e1Pb0X1 nCmvwF4s0/r0y2LEd+8Mu/fFZ3vGFA9RLSSHG33z2davB5EYLl WhznBQSyi2DC5J4FSp930OjGpD2gdkKaHpC+JsFDv9V53wXpNt esjVMvDYQYk5QvSr9ZbTM27RHdPoP6CATiwWgUcJB6q5FG38jO duc2tAu5szLIynjBsBfyTC1cSqF2eWrX9Z6aZYPcsJbH9ChlUW eBzAwiviXywd7mAeVG+I1uU6y9e1MxzAtdZidcEioPBw4YWr4e 4LsX5BtKqOS5ivO9qO9bwCnxXN4/SISpm4I57KeLgwxQ+K2o7i 7hShPuWFgT2uUbvVPGh8= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 11 May 2012, Roland Stigge wrote: > Right. Personally, I would be fine with either of my v8 (all banks in > dt, referenced naturally by name) and v9 (one simple DT entry for the > whole GPIO controller, integer index for referencing banks) patches. > > Consider the DT-documented mapping in the latter case: > > 0: GPIO P0 > 1: GPIO P1 > 2: GPIO P2 > 3: GPIO P3 > 4: GPI P3 > 5: GPO P3 > > Not too difficult and would also be acceptable, IMO. > > So Arnd and Grant, please agree one of those and pick it. :-) > Grant is maintainer for both GPIO and DT, so his opinion is what counts in this case. I was merely giving the background on how we got there so he can make an informed decision. Arnd