On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 02:20:30PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

> Signef-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

Typo :)

> +int max77693_read_reg(struct regmap *map, u8 reg, u8 *dest)
> +{
> +	unsigned int val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(map, reg, &val);
> +	val &= 0xff;
> +	*dest = val;

Should be no need for the val &= 0xff - if there is there's a bug we
ought to fix in regmap.

> +int max77693_update_reg(struct regmap *map, u8 reg, u8 val, u8 mask)
> +{
> +	unsigned int old_val, new_val;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_read(map, reg, &old_val);
> +	old_val &= 0xff;
> +	new_val = (val & mask) | (old_val & (~mask));
> +	ret = regmap_write(map, reg, new_val);

This should be using regmap_update_bits(), the current code is buggy as
it does not lock which means that multiple simultaneous updaters could
conflict with each other.

> +static struct regmap_config max77693_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits = 8,
> +	.val_bits = 8,

Defining max_register would let you see the register map in debugfs but
this is optional.

> +	max77693->regmap = regmap_init_i2c(i2c, &max77693_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(max77693->regmap)) {

devm_regmap_init_i2c().