* [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Don't try to flag IRQ 0 as a wake source
@ 2012-05-13 20:53 Mark Brown
2012-05-14 21:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-13 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: patches, linux-kernel, Mark Brown
If we've not got a primary IRQ we shouldn't be trying to flag IRQ 0 as a
wake source.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
index bec4d05..2be9628 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm831x-irq.c
@@ -565,17 +565,6 @@ int wm831x_irq_init(struct wm831x *wm831x, int irq)
wm831x_set_bits(wm831x, WM831X_IRQ_CONFIG,
WM831X_IRQ_OD, i);
- /* Try to flag /IRQ as a wake source; there are a number of
- * unconditional wake sources in the PMIC so this isn't
- * conditional but we don't actually care *too* much if it
- * fails.
- */
- ret = enable_irq_wake(irq);
- if (ret != 0) {
- dev_warn(wm831x->dev, "Can't enable IRQ as wake source: %d\n",
- ret);
- }
-
wm831x->irq = irq;
/* Register them with genirq */
@@ -597,6 +586,18 @@ int wm831x_irq_init(struct wm831x *wm831x, int irq)
}
if (irq) {
+ /* Try to flag /IRQ as a wake source; there are a number of
+ * unconditional wake sources in the PMIC so this isn't
+ * conditional but we don't actually care *too* much if it
+ * fails.
+ */
+ ret = enable_irq_wake(irq);
+ if (ret != 0) {
+ dev_warn(wm831x->dev,
+ "Can't enable IRQ as wake source: %d\n",
+ ret);
+ }
+
ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, wm831x_irq_thread,
IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
"wm831x", wm831x);
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Don't try to flag IRQ 0 as a wake source
2012-05-13 20:53 [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Don't try to flag IRQ 0 as a wake source Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-14 21:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2012-05-14 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: patches, linux-kernel
Hi Mark,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:53:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> If we've not got a primary IRQ we shouldn't be trying to flag IRQ 0 as a
> wake source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Patch applied, thanks.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-14 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-13 20:53 [PATCH] mfd: wm831x: Don't try to flag IRQ 0 as a wake source Mark Brown
2012-05-14 21:12 ` Samuel Ortiz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).