public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: dannf@dannf.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de,
	matt.fleming@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH, resend] x86: enable rtc-efi
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:40:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120515134017.GA26656@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB277F20200007800083D5B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:36:18PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 15.05.12 at 15:26, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 02:22:53PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > 
> >> I don't think so - the two drivers could end up manipulating the
> >> same piece of hardware, without synchronization. rtc-cmos
> >> really should bail when loaded on an EFI-enabled system.
> > 
> > That's why we're taking the rtc lock.
> 
> Which is completely bogus imo (i.e. it should be a goal to remove
> this).

Sure, once we've fixed the EFI clock and made sure that there's no 
lingering accesses to the old nvram.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

      reply	other threads:[~2012-05-15 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-15 12:08 [PATCH, resend] x86: enable rtc-efi Jan Beulich
2012-05-15 12:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-15 12:41   ` Matt Fleming
2012-05-15 12:50     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-15 13:08   ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-15 13:16     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-15 13:22       ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-15 13:26         ` Matthew Garrett
2012-05-15 13:36           ` Jan Beulich
2012-05-15 13:40             ` Matthew Garrett [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120515134017.GA26656@srcf.ucam.org \
    --to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=dannf@dannf.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox