From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else"
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:24:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517222407.GB15766@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337292765-12221-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:12:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> The Linux kernel coding style says that single-statement blocks should
> omit curly braces unless the other leg of the "if" statement has
> multiple statements, in which case the curly braces should be included.
> This commit fixes RCU's violations of this rule.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> index fc31a2d..cd9ae33 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> @@ -351,8 +351,9 @@ static int rcu_initiate_boost(void)
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks =
> rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.gp_tasks;
> invoke_rcu_callbacks();
> - } else
> + } else {
> RCU_TRACE(rcu_initiate_boost_trace());
> + }
> return 1;
> }
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> index e66b34a..d7c3cb1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutorture.c
> @@ -407,8 +407,9 @@ rcu_torture_cb(struct rcu_head *p)
> if (++rp->rtort_pipe_count >= RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN) {
> rp->rtort_mbtest = 0;
> rcu_torture_free(rp);
> - } else
> + } else {
> cur_ops->deferred_free(rp);
> + }
> }
>
> static int rcu_no_completed(void)
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 0da7b88..25874a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -893,8 +893,9 @@ static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct
> if (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) {
> rdp->qs_pending = 1;
> rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
> - } else
> + } else {
> rdp->qs_pending = 0;
> + }
> zero_cpu_stall_ticks(rdp);
> }
> }
> @@ -2115,9 +2116,9 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> put_online_cpus();
>
> /* No joy, try again later. Or just synchronize_sched(). */
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_sched();
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 2411000..c9b173c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -398,8 +398,9 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> rnp->grphi,
> !!rnp->gp_tasks);
> rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(rnp, flags);
> - } else
> + } else {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> + }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST
> /* Unboost if we were boosted. */
> @@ -429,9 +430,9 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> {
> struct task_struct *t = current;
>
> - if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
> + if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1) {
> --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> - else {
> + } else {
> barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
> t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> @@ -824,9 +825,9 @@ sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp)
> int must_wait = 0;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks))
> + if (list_empty(&rnp->blkd_tasks)) {
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
> - else {
> + } else {
> rnp->exp_tasks = rnp->blkd_tasks.next;
> rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock */
> must_wait = 1;
> @@ -870,9 +871,9 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
> * expedited grace period for us, just leave.
> */
> while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
> - if (trycount++ < 10)
> + if (trycount++ < 10) {
> udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
> - else {
> + } else {
> synchronize_rcu();
> return;
> }
> @@ -2213,8 +2214,9 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(int cpu)
> if (rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(cpu)) {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("More callbacks");
> invoke_rcu_core();
> - } else
> + } else {
> trace_rcu_prep_idle("Callbacks drained");
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 22:12 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/2] Code-style fixes Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:12 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else" Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:12 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/2] rcu: Fix broken strings in RCU's source code Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 22:32 ` Josh Triplett
2012-05-17 22:32 ` Paul Bolle
2012-05-18 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-18 12:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:23 ` Josh Triplett
2012-05-17 22:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-17 22:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-17 22:24 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-05-18 7:38 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] rcu: Fix code-style issues involving "else" Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517222407.GB15766@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox