* [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions
@ 2012-05-02 11:46 Mark Brown
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
2012-05-18 0:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Grant Likely
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-02 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
Currently the managed gpio_request() and gpio_free() are not stubbed out
for configurations not using gpiolib - do that to aid use in drivers.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
I thought you'd applied this but it's not showing up in -next.
include/linux/gpio.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index d1890d46..8e0fe1b 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
+ const char *label)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
unsigned long flags, const char *label)
{
@@ -93,6 +99,14 @@ static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
WARN_ON(1);
}
+static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+
+ /* GPIO can never have been requested */
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
{
might_sleep();
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
2012-05-02 11:46 [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-02 11:46 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-12 19:05 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-12 23:19 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-18 0:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Grant Likely
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-02 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
with devres.
As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
done.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
drivers/gpio/devres.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-generic/gpio.h | 2 ++
include/linux/gpio.h | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/devres.c b/drivers/gpio/devres.c
index 3dd2939..d21a9ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/devres.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/devres.c
@@ -71,6 +71,35 @@ int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio, const char *label)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_gpio_request);
/**
+ * devm_gpio_request_one - request a single GPIO with initial setup
+ * @dev: device to request for
+ * @gpio: the GPIO number
+ * @flags: GPIO configuration as specified by GPIOF_*
+ * @label: a literal description string of this GPIO
+ */
+int devm_gpio_request_one(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
+ unsigned long flags, const char *label)
+{
+ unsigned *dr;
+ int rc;
+
+ dr = devres_alloc(devm_gpio_release, sizeof(unsigned), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dr)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ rc = gpio_request_one(gpio, flags, label);
+ if (rc) {
+ devres_free(dr);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ *dr = gpio;
+ devres_add(dev, dr);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
* devm_gpio_free - free an interrupt
* @dev: device to free gpio for
* @gpio: gpio to free
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
index 5f52690..4ead123 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/gpio.h
@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ extern void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num);
/* bindings for managed devices that want to request gpios */
int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio, const char *label);
+int devm_gpio_request_one(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
+ unsigned long flags, const char *label);
void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned int gpio);
#ifdef CONFIG_GPIO_SYSFS
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index 8e0fe1b..a68024e 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int devm_gpio_request_one(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
+ unsigned long flags, const char *label)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int gpio_request_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
{
return -ENOSYS;
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-12 19:05 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-18 0:10 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 23:19 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-05-12 19:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
> with devres.
> As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
> the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
> explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
> systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
> in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
> lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
> done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Any chance we can get this into 3.5? Writing error handling code is
boring :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
2012-05-12 19:05 ` Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-18 0:10 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-05-18 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:05:02 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:46:46PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
> > with devres.
>
> > As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
> > the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
> > explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
> > systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
> > in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
> > lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
> > done.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>
> Any chance we can get this into 3.5? Writing error handling code is
> boring :)
Applied, thanks. I'll push it out this evening.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one()
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
2012-05-12 19:05 ` Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-12 23:19 ` Linus Walleij
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2012-05-12 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown; +Cc: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> Allow drivers to use the modern request and configure idiom together
> with devres.
>
> As with plain gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() we can't implement
> the old school version in terms of _one() as this would force the
> explicit selection of a direction in gpio_request() which could break
> systems if we pick the wrong one. Implementing devm_gpio_request_one()
> in terms of devm_gpio_request() would needlessly complicate things or
> lead to duplication from the unmanaged version depending on how it's
> done.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions
2012-05-02 11:46 [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Mark Brown
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
@ 2012-05-18 0:11 ` Grant Likely
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-05-18 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
On Wed, 2 May 2012 12:46:45 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> Currently the managed gpio_request() and gpio_free() are not stubbed out
> for configurations not using gpiolib - do that to aid use in drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> ---
>
> I thought you'd applied this but it's not showing up in -next.
It was in my local tree. I think I just forgot to push it out.
g.
>
> include/linux/gpio.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
> index d1890d46..8e0fe1b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> +static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
> + const char *label)
> +{
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
> unsigned long flags, const char *label)
> {
> @@ -93,6 +99,14 @@ static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
> WARN_ON(1);
> }
>
> +static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + /* GPIO can never have been requested */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> +}
> +
> static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
> {
> might_sleep();
> --
> 1.7.10
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions
@ 2012-04-04 15:14 Mark Brown
2012-04-06 4:40 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2012-04-04 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
Currently the managed gpio_request() and gpio_free() are not stubbed out
for configurations not using gpiolib - do that to aid use in drivers.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
---
include/linux/gpio.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
index f8b46af..ceb8eef 100644
--- a/include/linux/gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
@@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ static inline int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
+ const char *label)
+{
+ return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
unsigned long flags, const char *label)
{
@@ -108,6 +114,14 @@ static inline void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
WARN_ON(1);
}
+static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+
+ /* GPIO can never have been requested */
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+
static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
{
might_sleep();
--
1.7.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions
2012-04-04 15:14 Mark Brown
@ 2012-04-06 4:40 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2012-04-06 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Linus Walleij; +Cc: linux-kernel, Mark Brown
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:14:48 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> Currently the managed gpio_request() and gpio_free() are not stubbed out
> for configurations not using gpiolib - do that to aid use in drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Applied, thanks.
g.
> ---
> include/linux/gpio.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio.h b/include/linux/gpio.h
> index f8b46af..ceb8eef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ static inline int gpio_request(unsigned gpio, const char *label)
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
>
> +static inline int devm_gpio_request(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio,
> + const char *label)
> +{
> + return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> static inline int gpio_request_one(unsigned gpio,
> unsigned long flags, const char *label)
> {
> @@ -108,6 +114,14 @@ static inline void gpio_free(unsigned gpio)
> WARN_ON(1);
> }
>
> +static inline void devm_gpio_free(struct device *dev, unsigned gpio)
> +{
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + /* GPIO can never have been requested */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> +}
> +
> static inline void gpio_free_array(const struct gpio *array, size_t num)
> {
> might_sleep();
> --
> 1.7.9.1
>
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies,Ltd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-18 0:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-02 11:46 [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Mark Brown
2012-05-02 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Implement devm_gpio_request_one() Mark Brown
2012-05-12 19:05 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-18 0:10 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-12 23:19 ` Linus Walleij
2012-05-18 0:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add !CONFIG_GPIOLIB definitions of devm_ functions Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-04 15:14 Mark Brown
2012-04-06 4:40 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).