public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Cc: "lrg@ti.com" <lrg@ti.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 00:13:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120519231347.GD16590@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB80CEE.4050201@nvidia.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1809 bytes --]

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:43:18AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> For mapping, the node should start from "regulators", not from pmu
> on this example.

What makes you say this?  I'm really not even sure what it means.
How does a node "start" from something?  Supply mappings are direct
links between consumers and regulators.

> Here my understanding is that config->of_node should contain the
> node information of the regulator being registered only. In DT case,
> it should not be null.

Right, but this is unrelated to what we're doing when the regulator is a
consumer.  Then we just do the same thing as regulator_get(dev, name).

> >I still don't see any change needed here, from the above it simply looks
> >like the supplies aren't set up.

> Unfortunately,
> My regulator_get is failing if I dont correct the above logic to
> have proper config.of_node.

But this seems like it is unrelated to the patch we're discussing!  Your
patch does nothing to config.of_node, it changes the device used to look
up the supply.  To repeat yet again:

| context of the class device we create.  I can't think of any situation
| where I'd expect that to make matters any better - the class device
| should certainly never appear in the device tree and isn't going to have
| a stable name for non-DT systems either.

*Please* engage with this, especially the non-DT part.  You need to
explain how what you're saying is related to the patch you posted, you
keep talking about a "proper" config.of_node and saying this happens to
make your system work but this isn't visibily related to the patch you
posted.

What is not "proper" about the of_node that was supplied for the
regulator being registered?  In what way is this related to the device
used by the regulator functioning as a consumer to request a supply?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-19 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-19 14:14 [PATCH] regulator: core: use correct device for device supply lookup Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 16:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:14   ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:20     ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:40       ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 17:56         ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 18:26           ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 19:03             ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 20:50               ` Mark Brown
2012-05-19 21:13                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 23:13                   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-05-20  7:34                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20  9:01                       ` Mark Brown
     [not found]                         ` <4FB8C9EF.7010400@nvidia.com>
2012-05-20 12:06                           ` Mark Brown
2012-05-20 12:14                             ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-20 12:10                         ` Laxman Dewangan
2012-05-19 17:28     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120519231347.GD16590@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox