From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
"Linux PM list" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [-next regression] TCP window full with EPOLLWAKEUP
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 14:53:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205201453.11794.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205201423.08334.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, May 20, 2012, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > a bisection shows that with the following commit from -next:
> > commit 4d7e30d98939a0340022ccd49325a3d70f7e0238
> > Author: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
> > Date: Tue May 1 21:33:34 2012 +0200
> >
> > epoll: Add a flag, EPOLLWAKEUP, to prevent suspend while epoll
> > events are ready
> >
> > ====
> >
> > one of mono programs I use stops receiving data from the network.
> > Wireshark shows that the TCP window of a connection is filled. This
> > means the program does not read the data fast enough after requesting
> > the data.
> >
> > If I revert that commit on the top of -next (20120518), everything works
> > as expected.
>
> Hmm. I suppose that the failing program doesn't set EPOLLWAKEUP by mistake,
> does it?
If it doesn't, we can assume that epi-ws is always NULL and all of the added
overhead comes from the function calls. So, I wonder if the appended patch
makes any difference?
Rafael
---
fs/eventpoll.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux/fs/eventpoll.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ linux/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -597,7 +597,8 @@ static int ep_scan_ready_list(struct eve
*/
if (!ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
}
}
/*
@@ -611,7 +612,8 @@ static int ep_scan_ready_list(struct eve
* Quickly re-inject items left on "txlist".
*/
list_splice(&txlist, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_relax(ep->ws);
+ if (ep->ws)
+ __pm_relax(ep->ws);
if (!list_empty(&ep->rdllist)) {
/*
@@ -750,7 +752,9 @@ static int ep_read_events_proc(struct ev
* callback, but it's not actually ready, as far as
* caller requested events goes. We can remove it here.
*/
- __pm_relax(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_relax(epi->ws);
+
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
}
}
@@ -956,7 +960,8 @@ static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_t
/* If this file is already in the ready list we exit soon */
if (!ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
}
/*
@@ -1219,7 +1224,8 @@ static int ep_insert(struct eventpoll *e
/* If the file is already "ready" we drop it inside the ready list */
if ((revents & event->events) && !ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
/* Notify waiting tasks that events are available */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
@@ -1309,7 +1315,8 @@ static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *e
spin_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
if (!ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
/* Notify waiting tasks that events are available */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
@@ -1357,9 +1364,12 @@ static int ep_send_events_proc(struct ev
* instead, but then epi->ws would temporarily be out of sync
* with ep_is_linked().
*/
- if (epi->ws && epi->ws->active)
- __pm_stay_awake(ep->ws);
- __pm_relax(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws) {
+ if (epi->ws->active)
+ __pm_stay_awake(ep->ws);
+
+ __pm_relax(epi->ws);
+ }
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
pt._key = epi->event.events;
@@ -1376,7 +1386,9 @@ static int ep_send_events_proc(struct ev
if (__put_user(revents, &uevent->events) ||
__put_user(epi->event.data, &uevent->data)) {
list_add(&epi->rdllink, head);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+
return eventcnt ? eventcnt : -EFAULT;
}
eventcnt++;
@@ -1396,7 +1408,8 @@ static int ep_send_events_proc(struct ev
* poll callback will queue them in ep->ovflist.
*/
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
- __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
+ if (epi->ws)
+ __pm_stay_awake(epi->ws);
}
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-20 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-19 22:06 [-next regression] TCP window full with EPOLLWAKEUP Jiri Slaby
2012-05-20 12:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-20 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-05-20 18:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-21 13:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-05-21 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-21 19:28 ` [PATCH] epoll: Fix user space breakage related to EPOLLWAKEUP (was: Re: [-next regression] TCP window full with EPOLLWAKEUP) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-05-21 22:11 ` Arve Hjønnevåg
2012-05-22 15:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205201453.11794.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox