Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Add r_select to lm3533 platform data

[Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:08:44AM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Johan,
> 
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:45:39AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 03:13:37PM +0200, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > > Hi Johan,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 08:22:45PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > Add resistor-select parameter to the platform data.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <jhovold@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Samuel, 
> > > > 
> > > > I believe this one needs to go in through mfd as the iio driver
> > > > destined for staging-next depends on it.
> > > It should go along with the iio driver if there is a build dependency.
> > > No doing so will prevent the tree from being bisectable.
> > 
> > The sub-drivers already depend on mfd to build as this is where the
> > header file resides. 
> I haven't looked at it, but if the iio driver Kconfig entry depends on
> MFD_LM3533, then I can take this change in as no one will be able to build
> your iio driver until the MFD driver is merged.
> Is that the case ?

Yes, it is.

Thanks,
Johan