linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	agk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 12/13] Make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily large bios
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:32:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120521183253.GA30143@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120521175542.GA16598@google.com>

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:55:42AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:17:06PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > May be I am missing something, hence I will ask.  Is punting to workqueue
> > will really solve the issue raised by Neil. 
> > 
> > Due to spliting required, we will be holding some bios in the stack and
> > these bios can't be submitted till further allocation from pool happens. So
> > will it matter whether we are waiting for allocation in submitting process
> > context or in worker thread context.
> 
> Punting to workqueue allows all the bio splits that have already been
> allocated to be submitted.
>
> > IOW, say you have a pool of 2 bios. We allocate 1 bio (say bio A),  and submit
> > it for IO (now 1 bio left in pool). Now, bio A needs to be split up, so we
> > allocate bio B and submit it (pool is empty now). Now we try to submit bio
> > B and this also needs to be split. There are no more free bios so we will
> > wait for some to get free but none of the bios (A and B) have actually
> > been submitted for IO so nothing will get freed and we have a deadlock
> > (This is assuming that memory is tight enough that we are not able to do
> > any allocations from the slab backing the mempool).
> 
> You're talking about a different issue. You can't safely split a split
> from the same bio pool - but this code doesn't do that since it adds a
> separate bio pool for each request_queue that's only for splits.

Ok, I missed the fact that there are per queue pools for bio allocation.
Thanks for clarifying.

Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-21 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-18  2:59 [PATCH 00/13] Block cleanups (for bcache) koverstreet
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 01/13] block: Generalized bio pool freeing koverstreet
2012-05-18 15:55   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 16:14     ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 02/13] dm: kill dm_rq_bio_destructor koverstreet
2012-05-18 15:57   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 16:43     ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-05-18 18:50       ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-22  4:29         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 03/13] block: Add bio_clone_bioset() koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:05   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 20:31     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18 16:11   ` [dm-devel] " Vivek Goyal
2012-05-18 18:55     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 04/13] block: Add bio_clone_kmalloc() koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:09   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 20:39     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18 16:45   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 05/13] block: Only clone bio vecs that are in use koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:13   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 21:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 06/13] block: Add bio_reset() koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:16   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 21:48     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] pktcdvd: Switch to bio_kmalloc() koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:18   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: Kill bi_destructor koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:21   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 22:21     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: Add an explicit bio flag for bios that own their bvec koverstreet
2012-05-18 16:30   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 21:49     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-18 17:07   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: Rework bio splitting koverstreet
2012-05-18 17:07   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18 17:46   ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 11/13] Closures koverstreet
2012-05-18 17:08   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-18  2:59 ` [PATCH 12/13] Make generic_make_request handle arbitrarily large bios koverstreet
2012-05-18  8:05   ` NeilBrown
2012-05-18  8:14     ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-21 17:17       ` [dm-devel] " Vivek Goyal
2012-05-21 17:55         ` Kent Overstreet
2012-05-21 18:32           ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-05-18 17:52   ` Tejun Heo
2012-05-19  0:59     ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2012-05-18 22:48   ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-05-18  3:00 ` [PATCH 13/13] Gut bio_add_page() koverstreet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120521183253.GA30143@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=koverstreet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).