From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block/throttle: Add IO throttled information in blkcg.
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 11:06:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120522150606.GH3045@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBBA63B.1090401@tao.ma>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:44:11PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
> Thanks for the quick response.
> On 05/22/2012 07:11 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:10:36PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
> >> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
> >>
> >> Currently, if the IO is throttled by io-throttle, the SA has no idea of
> >> the situation and can't report it to the real application user about
> >> that he/she has to do something. So this patch adds a new interface
> >> named blkio.throttle.io_throttled which indicates how many IOs are
> >> currently throttled.
> >
> > If the only purpose is to know whether IOs are being throttled, why
> > not just scan for the rules and see if respective device has any
> > throttling rules or not.
> Sorry, but setting a throttling rules doesn't mean the IOs are
> throttled, right? So scanning doesn't work here IMHO.
It means IOs will be throttled if you cross a certain rate. But yes, it
does not give any information that if at time T if there are any bios
throttled in the queue or not.
> >
> > Even if you introduce this interface, you will end up scanning for
> > throttled ios against that particular device. And if IO is not happening
> > at that moment or if IO rate is not exceeding the rate limit, there
> > might not be any throttled ios and one might get misled.
> Oh, no actually in a *clound computing* environment, it is really
> useful, not misled. So let me describe it in more detail. Our product
> system will limit every instance to an approximate number at first, and
> then watch out the IOs being throttled. If these numbers is high, it can:
> 1) Shout loudly to the application programmer about the abuse if he
> sends out too much IO requests.
> 2) If it is not too much and some other instances are not active, adjust
> the throttled ratio so that this instance can work much faster.
Ok, so you want to use this more as "congestion" parameter which tells at
a given moment how busy the queue is, or in this instance how many IOs
are backlogged in a cgroup due to throttling limits.
I guess, it is not a bad idea to export this stat then. Will
"blkio.throttle.queued" be a better name to reflect that how many bios
are currently queued in throttling layer of request queue.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-22 8:10 [RFC] block/throttle: Add IO throttled information in blkcg Tao Ma
2012-05-22 11:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-05-22 14:44 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-22 15:06 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2012-05-22 15:14 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-22 20:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-05-23 2:21 ` Tao Ma
2012-05-29 7:51 ` Tao Ma
2012-06-04 15:06 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120522150606.GH3045@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tm@tao.ma \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox