From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:50:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523155003.GA8202@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337787838.1734.15.camel@joe2Laptop>
* Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 17:03 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Chen <hi3766691@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Still you are just trying to said that your code is not bloated?
> > > Up to over 500K for a cpu scheduler. Laughing
> >
> > Where did you get that 500K from? You are off from the truth
> > almost by an order of magnitude.
> >
> > Here's the scheduler size on Linus's latest tree, on 64-bit
> > defconfig's:
> >
> > $ size kernel/sched/built-in.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 83611 10404 2524 96539 1791b kernel/sched/built-in.o
> >
> > That's SMP+NUMA, i.e. everything included.
> >
> > The !NUMA !SMP UP scheduler, if you are on a size starved
> > ultra-embedded device, is even smaller, just 22K:
> >
> > $ size kernel/sched/built-in.o
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 19882 2218 148 22248 56e8 kernel/sched/built-in.o
>
> Here's an allyesconfig x86-32
allyesconfig includes a whole lot of debugging code so it's a
pretty meaningless size test.
> $ size kernel/sched/built-in.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 213892 10856 65832 290580 46f14 kernel/sched/built-in.o
>
> But that's not the only sched related code.
>
> In a 1000 cpu config, there also an extra 500+ bytes per cpu
> in printk (I don't think that's particularly important btw)
A 1000 cpu piece of hardware will have a terabyte of RAM or
more. 0.5K per CPU is reasonable.
> kernel/printk.c adds:
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char [PRINTK_BUF_SIZE], printk_sched_buf);
>
> Maybe #ifdefing this when !CONFIG_PRINTK would reduce size
> a little in a few cases. I've attached a trivial suggested patch.
That might make sense for the ultra-embedded.
Still 500K is an obviously nonsensical number.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 16:16 Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP Vincent Guittot
2012-05-11 16:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-05-11 16:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 8:41 ` Juri Lelli
2012-05-15 0:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-15 8:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 8:34 ` mou Chen
2012-05-15 9:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 9:17 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-05-15 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 11:35 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-05-15 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 12:32 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-05-15 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-19 14:58 ` Luming Yu
2012-05-15 20:26 ` valdis.kletnieks
2012-05-15 20:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-16 12:08 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-05-15 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 12:57 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 15:05 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 15:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-15 15:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-05-15 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-15 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-16 18:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-19 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-19 22:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-22 2:38 ` Chen
2012-05-22 5:14 ` Chen
2012-05-30 7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-23 15:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-23 15:43 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-23 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-23 15:56 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-23 15:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-29 18:17 ` [PATCH] printk: Shrink printk_sched buffer size, eliminate it when !CONFIG_PRINTK Joe Perches
2012-06-05 16:04 ` Joe Perches
2012-06-06 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-06 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-06-06 7:42 ` Joe Perches
2012-05-19 23:13 ` Plumbers: Tweaking scheduler policy micro-conf RFP Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-19 23:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-21 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-21 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-16 18:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-05-16 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-16 21:20 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <20120518161817.GE18312@e103034-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
2012-05-18 16:24 ` Morten Rasmussen
2012-05-18 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-05-18 16:46 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2012-05-15 16:30 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2012-05-15 18:13 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120523155003.GA8202@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hi3766691@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox