public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 19:48:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523174844.GA3373@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBD1AC8.7020602@zytor.com>


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> On 05/23/2012 10:07 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sasha Levin (1):
> >>      x86, printk: Add missing KERN_CONT to NMI selftest
> > 
> > Why? This seems to be garbage.
> > 
> 
> This was added to the urgent branch earlier (but it wasn't 
> worth pushing late in rc) but apparently a more underlying bug 
> was fixed in the meantime.
> 
> It didn't seem worth removing since the KERN_CONT should 
> really be there anyway.

I'm not sure it should be there: if there's no KERN_ prefix in a 
printk, and the previous printk from this context did not end 
with \n, then the KERN_CONT should be implicit.

KERN_CONT is really special, for rare cases where you want to 
explicitly avoid the <> priority field or to construct it.

Or at least that's how I understand this area, it might have 
been updated meanwhile - Linus?

Also, we can rebase the whole branch and get rid of this one and 
of the merge commit it has.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-23 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-23 11:34 [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fixes for v3.5 Ingo Molnar
2012-05-23 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-23 17:13   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-23 17:48     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2012-05-23 17:57       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-24  5:27         ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-24 15:31         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-05-24 15:44           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-05-24 15:54             ` Chen
2012-05-24 17:07               ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-25  2:40                 ` Chen
2012-05-30  7:23                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-05-24 15:48           ` Chen
2012-05-24 17:19             ` Joe Perches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120523174844.GA3373@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox