From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: check for valid irq_cfg pointer in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:02:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120523200226.GA6936@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337801086.1997.197.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:24:46PM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 14:04 -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:16:36PM -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > > In create_irq_nr() there is a window where we have set vector_irq in
> > > __assign_irq_vector(), but not yet called irq_set_chip_data() to set the
> > > irq_cfg pointer.
>
> Ha. Now I understand how it can happen during boot/module load time.
> Thanks.
>
> > BTW - is there a reason why we're calling irq_set_chip_data() in create_irq_nr()
> > rather than in __assign_irq_vector() for the case where irq_cfg is NULL?
>
> assign_irq_vector() is also for setting up vectors during irq migration.
> So may be we could have done the irq_set_chip_data() in create_irq_nr()
> itself before calling assign_irq_vector(). Anyways, this change can't
> help in case of destroy irq path which can also lead to the same issue
> of de-referencing null pointer.
>
> Also, it will be nice if you can refer to this destroy irq path in your
> changelog.
>
> Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
OK. Hopefully this covers it.
A NULL pointer dereference can occur in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt() if
we haven't yet setup the irq_cfg pointer in the irq_desc.irq_data.chip_data.
In create_irq_nr() there is a window where we have set vector_irq in
__assign_irq_vector(), but not yet called irq_set_chip_data() to set the
irq_cfg pointer.
Should an IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR hit the cpu in question during this time,
smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt() will attempt to process the aforementioned
irq, but panic when accessing irq_cfg.
There is also a window in destroy_irq() where we've cleared the irq_cfg
pointer in free_irq_cfg(), but have not yet called irq_free_desc(). Note
that we have cleared vector_irq in __clear_irq_vector() prior to free_irq_cfg(),
but smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt() might've already referenced the irq_desc.
Only continue processing the irq if irq_cfg is non-NULL.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -2478,9 +2478,12 @@ asmlinkage void smp_irq_move_cleanup_int
if (!desc)
continue;
- cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+ cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
+ if (!cfg)
+ goto unlock;
+
/*
* Check if the irq migration is in progress. If so, we
* haven't received the cleanup request yet for this irq.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 16:49 [PATCH] x86: check for valid irq_cfg pointer in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-21 21:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-21 21:09 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-21 21:10 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-22 2:41 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-21 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-21 21:19 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-21 21:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-23 18:16 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-23 19:04 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-23 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-23 19:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-23 20:02 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2012-05-23 23:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-24 1:40 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-24 14:37 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-24 18:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-24 19:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-26 0:23 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-05-26 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-27 1:41 ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-30 13:46 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-05-24 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-24 15:36 ` Dimitri Sivanich
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-16 12:50 Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120523200226.GA6936@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).