public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ
@ 2012-05-24  9:19 Alessandro Rubini
  2012-05-24  9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Rubini @ 2012-05-24  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King - ARM Linux; +Cc: Giancarlo Asnaghi, Alan Cox, linux-kernel

I'm using PrimeCell devices under PCIe, x86 platform. We discussed
this issue on Mar 1st, and you (Russell) reported that NO_IRQ is
expected to go away for ARM, as 0 is the new official "no irq" marker.

The trivial patch below is what I'm currently using to compile my
stuff, but I'd like to get an update about NO_IRQ in ARM (which you
complained was completely on your shoulders). If needed I can take it
over and propose patches.

I'm well aware that the few users within arch/arm are matched by a
much bigger number of users in drivers/ .  The work is not trivial,
but at least I hope to be able to remove NO_IRQ from amba/bus.c by
auditing all its users.

thanks
/alessandro
---
 drivers/amba/bus.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
index 64ddedd..490a308 100644
--- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
@@ -546,10 +546,10 @@ int amba_device_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
 		goto err_release;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-	if (dev->irq[0] && dev->irq[0] != NO_IRQ)
+	if (dev->irq[0])
 		ret = device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_irq0);
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-	if (ret == 0 && dev->irq[1] && dev->irq[1] != NO_IRQ)
+	if (ret == 0 && dev->irq[1])
 		ret = device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_irq1);
 	printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
 	if (ret == 0)
-- 
1.7.7.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ
  2012-05-24  9:19 RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ Alessandro Rubini
@ 2012-05-24  9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2012-05-24  9:37   ` Alessandro Rubini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-05-24  9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alessandro Rubini; +Cc: Giancarlo Asnaghi, Alan Cox, linux-kernel

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:19:33AM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> I'm using PrimeCell devices under PCIe, x86 platform. We discussed
> this issue on Mar 1st, and you (Russell) reported that NO_IRQ is
> expected to go away for ARM, as 0 is the new official "no irq" marker.
> 
> The trivial patch below is what I'm currently using to compile my
> stuff, but I'd like to get an update about NO_IRQ in ARM (which you
> complained was completely on your shoulders). If needed I can take it
> over and propose patches.
> 
> I'm well aware that the few users within arch/arm are matched by a
> much bigger number of users in drivers/ .  The work is not trivial,
> but at least I hope to be able to remove NO_IRQ from amba/bus.c by
> auditing all its users.

See dfb85185bda373a70409c70c2632b02fb0f8f449 in mainline.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ
  2012-05-24  9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-05-24  9:37   ` Alessandro Rubini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Rubini @ 2012-05-24  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux; +Cc: giancarlo.asnaghi, alan, linux-kernel

> See dfb85185bda373a70409c70c2632b02fb0f8f449 in mainline.

Thanks!

Then I need to check why my rebase on linux-next didn't drop my own patch.

/alessandro

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-24  9:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-24  9:19 RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ Alessandro Rubini
2012-05-24  9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-24  9:37   ` Alessandro Rubini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox