* RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ
@ 2012-05-24 9:19 Alessandro Rubini
2012-05-24 9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro Rubini @ 2012-05-24 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King - ARM Linux; +Cc: Giancarlo Asnaghi, Alan Cox, linux-kernel
I'm using PrimeCell devices under PCIe, x86 platform. We discussed
this issue on Mar 1st, and you (Russell) reported that NO_IRQ is
expected to go away for ARM, as 0 is the new official "no irq" marker.
The trivial patch below is what I'm currently using to compile my
stuff, but I'd like to get an update about NO_IRQ in ARM (which you
complained was completely on your shoulders). If needed I can take it
over and propose patches.
I'm well aware that the few users within arch/arm are matched by a
much bigger number of users in drivers/ . The work is not trivial,
but at least I hope to be able to remove NO_IRQ from amba/bus.c by
auditing all its users.
thanks
/alessandro
---
drivers/amba/bus.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/amba/bus.c b/drivers/amba/bus.c
index 64ddedd..490a308 100644
--- a/drivers/amba/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/amba/bus.c
@@ -546,10 +546,10 @@ int amba_device_add(struct amba_device *dev, struct resource *parent)
goto err_release;
printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
- if (dev->irq[0] && dev->irq[0] != NO_IRQ)
+ if (dev->irq[0])
ret = device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_irq0);
printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
- if (ret == 0 && dev->irq[1] && dev->irq[1] != NO_IRQ)
+ if (ret == 0 && dev->irq[1])
ret = device_create_file(&dev->dev, &dev_attr_irq1);
printk(KERN_INFO "%s %i\n", __func__, __LINE__);
if (ret == 0)
--
1.7.7.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ
2012-05-24 9:19 RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ Alessandro Rubini
@ 2012-05-24 9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-24 9:37 ` Alessandro Rubini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-05-24 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alessandro Rubini; +Cc: Giancarlo Asnaghi, Alan Cox, linux-kernel
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:19:33AM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> I'm using PrimeCell devices under PCIe, x86 platform. We discussed
> this issue on Mar 1st, and you (Russell) reported that NO_IRQ is
> expected to go away for ARM, as 0 is the new official "no irq" marker.
>
> The trivial patch below is what I'm currently using to compile my
> stuff, but I'd like to get an update about NO_IRQ in ARM (which you
> complained was completely on your shoulders). If needed I can take it
> over and propose patches.
>
> I'm well aware that the few users within arch/arm are matched by a
> much bigger number of users in drivers/ . The work is not trivial,
> but at least I hope to be able to remove NO_IRQ from amba/bus.c by
> auditing all its users.
See dfb85185bda373a70409c70c2632b02fb0f8f449 in mainline.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-24 9:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-24 9:19 RFC: amba: remove NO_IRQ Alessandro Rubini
2012-05-24 9:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-24 9:37 ` Alessandro Rubini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox