From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Avoid intermixing cpu dump_stack output on multi-processor systems
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:53:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120529175352.GA31524@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120524144229.GA27713@sgi.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:42:29AM -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> When multiple cpus on a multi-processor system call dump_stack()
> at the same time, the backtrace lines get intermixed, making
> the output worthless. Add a lock so each cpu stack dump comes
> out as a coherent set.
>
> For example, when a multi-processor system is NMIed, all of the
> cpus call dump_stack() at the same time, resulting in output for
> all of cpus getting intermixed, making it impossible to tell what
> any individual cpu was doing. With this patch each cpu prints
> its stack lines as a coherent set, so one can see what each cpu
> was doing.
For this particular test case, it sounds like you are doing what
trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() is doing? It doesn't solve the general
problem, but probably your particular usage?
Cheers,
Don
>
> It has been tested on a 4069 cpu system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c 2012-05-03 14:31:13.602345805 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c 2012-05-03 14:51:43.805197563 -0500
> @@ -186,7 +186,9 @@ void dump_stack(void)
> {
> unsigned long bp;
> unsigned long stack;
> + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock); /* Serialise the printks */
>
> + spin_lock(&lock);
> bp = stack_frame(current, NULL);
> printk("Pid: %d, comm: %.20s %s %s %.*s\n",
> current->pid, current->comm, print_tainted(),
> @@ -194,6 +196,7 @@ void dump_stack(void)
> (int)strcspn(init_utsname()->version, " "),
> init_utsname()->version);
> show_trace(NULL, NULL, &stack, bp);
> + spin_unlock(&lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dump_stack);
>
> --
> Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
> SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 14:42 [PATCH] x86: Avoid intermixing cpu dump_stack output on multi-processor systems Russ Anderson
2012-05-24 15:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-05-29 18:50 ` Russ Anderson
2012-05-29 17:53 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Russ Anderson
2012-05-29 22:39 ` Don Zickus
2012-05-29 23:11 ` Russ Anderson
2012-05-29 23:54 ` Don Zickus
2012-06-01 22:56 ` Russ Anderson
2012-06-04 14:23 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120529175352.GA31524@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox