From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757511Ab2EaHZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 03:25:13 -0400 Received: from zene.cmpxchg.org ([85.214.230.12]:34134 "EHLO zene.cmpxchg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751323Ab2EaHZM (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 03:25:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:25:05 +0200 From: Johannes Weiner To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ying Han Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20120531072505.GA1371@cmpxchg.org> References: <20120531141329.6f82889bcfaa30ca83a30937@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120531141329.6f82889bcfaa30ca83a30937@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:13:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in > mm/memcontrol.c between commit 78ccf5b5ab83 ("mm: memcg: print statistics > directly to seq_file") and others from Linus' tree and commit "memcg: add > mlock statistic in memory.stat" from the akpm tree. > > I just dropped the akpm patch for now. Thanks, Stephen. However, the patch is known to be broken and, according to mm-commits, was removed from -mm on May 16 already. How'd it reappear?