* linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
@ 2012-05-31 4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-01 23:41 ` Tyler Hicks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-05-31 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tyler Hicks; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 268 bytes --]
Hi Tyler,
I am just wondering about the fate of the ecryptfs tree. The most recent
commit to that tree is dated Feb 11 and seems to have been included in
Linus' tree as a different commit.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
2012-05-31 4:41 linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2012-06-01 23:41 ` Tyler Hicks
2012-06-02 3:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tyler Hicks @ 2012-06-01 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]
On 2012-05-31 14:41:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
>
> I am just wondering about the fate of the ecryptfs tree. The most recent
> commit to that tree is dated Feb 11 and seems to have been included in
> Linus' tree as a different commit.
My next branch has become stale. Sorry about that! I haven't been doing
much development on the kernel side in the last couple months. That will
soon change, as I have a few bug fixes in the works and I know of a
contribution or two that should surface shortly.
In the meantime, I've just pushed the HEAD of Linus' tree to my next
branch to clean things up.
Tyler
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
2012-06-01 23:41 ` Tyler Hicks
@ 2012-06-02 3:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2012-06-02 3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tyler Hicks; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 836 bytes --]
Hi Tyler,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 16:41:55 -0700 Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 2012-05-31 14:41:15, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > I am just wondering about the fate of the ecryptfs tree. The most recent
> > commit to that tree is dated Feb 11 and seems to have been included in
> > Linus' tree as a different commit.
>
> My next branch has become stale. Sorry about that! I haven't been doing
> much development on the kernel side in the last couple months. That will
> soon change, as I have a few bug fixes in the works and I know of a
> contribution or two that should surface shortly.
Thanks for that.
> In the meantime, I've just pushed the HEAD of Linus' tree to my next
> branch to clean things up.
Excellent.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-02 3:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-31 4:41 linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-01 23:41 ` Tyler Hicks
2012-06-02 3:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox