From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Doug Thompson <dougthompson@xmission.com>,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:27:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605172715.GQ13495@aftab.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCE40C3.5040902@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:24:19PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em 05-06-2012 14:17, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:26:39AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 06/04/2012 08:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> There will be no linux-next release tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20120604:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> on x86_64:
> >>
> >> drivers/edac/amd64_edac_inj.o: In function `amd64_remove_sysfs_dbg_files':
> >> amd64_edac_inj.c:(.text+0x420): multiple definition of `amd64_remove_sysfs_dbg_files'
> >> drivers/edac/amd64_edac.o:amd64_edac.c:(.text+0x3d60): first defined here
> >> make[3]: *** [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.o] Error 1
> >
> > Doesn't trigger on latest linus. But Mauro has a bunch of patches
> > touching these parts, can you try reverting if it is in linux-next, the
> > one below:
> >
> > commit faf20d4e226c53a963c384d36d8aa82c77be6dfb
> > Author: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed Mar 21 14:00:44 2012 -0300
> >
> > amd64_edac: convert sysfs logic to use struct device
> >
> > Now that the EDAC core supports struct device, there's no sense
> > on having any logic at the EDAC core to simulate it. So, instead
> > of adding such logic there, change the logic at amd64_edac to
> > use it.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
> It is probably just a Kconfig issue. I'll prepare a patch fixing it,
> posting it soon.
Just add it to the above patch - it is not merged anywhere anyway.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-05 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 3:30 linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-05 16:26 ` linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac) Randy Dunlap
2012-06-05 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-05 17:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-06-05 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2012-06-05 17:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-06-06 13:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-06 21:30 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120605172715.GQ13495@aftab.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox