public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix relax_domain_level interface
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:44:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120605184436.GA15668@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338921419.2749.31.camel@twins>

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:36:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 13:34 -0500, Dimitri Sivanich wrote:
> > 
> > I'll submit a patch shortly that should return these back to what appears to
> > be their intended functionality. 
> 
> I guess removing the max check in the paramater parsing is the easiest
> thing.
My thoughts exactly.



Fix the relax_domain_level boot parameter. It does not get processed because
sched_domain_level_max is 0 at the time that setup_relax_domain_level()
is run.  Simply accept the value as it is, as we don't know the value
of sched_domain_level_max until sched domain construction is completed.

Fix sched_relax_domain_level in cpuset.  The build_sched_domain() routine calls
the set_domain_attribute() routine prior to setting the sd->level, however,
the set_domain_attribute() routine relies on the sd->level to decide whether
idle load balancing will be off/on.

Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux/kernel/sched/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6165,11 +6165,8 @@ int sched_domain_level_max;
 
 static int __init setup_relax_domain_level(char *str)
 {
-	unsigned long val;
-
-	val = simple_strtoul(str, NULL, 0);
-	if (val < sched_domain_level_max)
-		default_relax_domain_level = val;
+	if (kstrtoint(str, 0, &default_relax_domain_level))
+		pr_warn("Unable to set relax_domain_level\n");
 
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -6543,7 +6540,6 @@ struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(
 	if (!sd)
 		return child;
 
-	set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
 	cpumask_and(sched_domain_span(sd), cpu_map, tl->mask(cpu));
 	if (child) {
 		sd->level = child->level + 1;
@@ -6551,6 +6547,7 @@ struct sched_domain *build_sched_domain(
 		child->parent = sd;
 	}
 	sd->child = child;
+	set_domain_attribute(sd, attr);
 
 	return sd;
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-01 21:03 relax_domain_level boot parameter has no effect Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-04 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 18:16   ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-05 18:34     ` Dimitri Sivanich
2012-06-05 18:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 18:44         ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2012-06-06 16:01           ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix the relax_domain_level boot parameter tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120605184436.GA15668@sgi.com \
    --to=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox