From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 08/12] kprobes: Inverse taking of module_mutex with kprobe_mutex
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:51:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120606040015.114545378@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20120606035058.108720095@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0008-kprobes-Inverse-taking-of-module_mutex-with-kprobe_m.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1965 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Currently module_mutex is taken before kprobe_mutex, but this
can cause issues when we have kprobes register ftrace, as the ftrace
mutex is taken before enabling a tracepoint, which currently takes
the module mutex.
If module_mutex is taken before kprobe_mutex, then we can not
have kprobes use the ftrace infrastructure.
There seems to be no reason that the kprobe_mutex can't be taken
before the module_mutex. Running lockdep shows that it is safe
among the kernels I've run.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120605102814.27845.21047.stgit@localhost.localdomain
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index c62b854..7a8a122 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -561,9 +561,9 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
{
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
+ mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
/* Lock modules while optimizing kprobes */
mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
/*
* Step 1: Unoptimize kprobes and collect cleaned (unused and disarmed)
@@ -586,8 +586,8 @@ static __kprobes void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
/* Step 4: Free cleaned kprobes after quiesence period */
do_free_cleaned_kprobes(&free_list);
- mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
/* Step 5: Kick optimizer again if needed */
if (!list_empty(&optimizing_list) || !list_empty(&unoptimizing_list))
--
1.7.10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-06 3:50 [RFC][PATCH 00/12] kprobes/ftrace: Making ftrace usable for kprobes Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/12] ftrace: Pass ftrace_ops as third parameter to function trace callback Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/12] ftrace: Consolidate arch dependent functions with list function Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/12] ftrace: Return pt_regs to function trace callback (x86_64 only so far) Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/12] ftrace/x86_32: Push ftrace_ops in as 3rd parameter to function tracer Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/12] ftrace/x86: Add separate function to save regs Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/12] ftrace/x86: Add save_regs for i386 function calls Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 14:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 15:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/12] ftrace: add ftrace_set_filter_ip() for address based filter Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/12] kprobes: cleanup to separate probe-able check Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/12] kprobes: Move locks into appropriate functions Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] kprobes: introduce ftrace based optimization Steven Rostedt
2012-06-06 3:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/12] kprobes/x86: ftrace based optimization for x86 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120606040015.114545378@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox