From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
jslaby@suse.cz, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: um: TTY fixes (?)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:19:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120607101951.14d6596d@bob.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCFE504.2020100@nod.at>
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 01:17:24 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> Am 04.06.2012 23:17, schrieb Alan Cox:
> > We can half ignore it on console for the simple reason that you
> > don't "dial in" to the console. I suspect it may be abusable but
> > I've not found a way to do so.
> >
>
> BTW: Can't we add such a mode to tty_port?
> E.g. tty_port->non_dialin_console. 8)
That is basically what you are doing when you omit a hangup method. The
security consequences on a multi-user box run deeper however so in the
end we need to fix the util-linux code.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 20:27 um: TTY fixes (?) Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] TTY: um/line, add tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] um: remove line_ioctl() Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] um: Remove dead code Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] um: fully use tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] um: remove count_lock Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 21:17 ` um: TTY fixes (?) Alan Cox
2012-06-04 23:14 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-05 10:41 ` Karel Zak
2012-06-05 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-05 12:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-05 15:17 ` Karel Zak
2012-07-12 14:49 ` Karel Zak
2012-07-12 15:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-06 23:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 9:19 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-06-07 9:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-06 14:20 ` [uml-devel] " Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 7:35 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 7:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 8:45 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 9:22 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 10:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 10:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 10:35 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 10:52 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 13:41 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 15:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 16:37 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 16:32 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 16:50 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 16:41 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 17:26 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120607101951.14d6596d@bob.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox