From: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jslaby@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120607102228.0ed8281e@bob.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FD06A22.6040002@nod.at>
> Breaking existing applications is a no-go, sorry.
Being insecure should also be a no-no.
Not sure what Jiri thinks but for the moment I think we need to push it
with a module option as to whether hangup on console is enabled or not.
I don't want to just break the existing user space, but leaving other
vendors systems insecure just to cover Fedora's backside is also not
entirely fair either.
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-04 20:27 um: TTY fixes (?) Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] TTY: um/line, add tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] TTY: um/line, use tty from tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] um: remove line_ioctl() Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] um: Remove dead code Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] um: fully use tty_port Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 20:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2012-06-04 20:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] um: remove count_lock Richard Weinberger
2012-06-04 21:17 ` um: TTY fixes (?) Alan Cox
2012-06-04 23:14 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-05 10:41 ` Karel Zak
2012-06-05 11:15 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-05 12:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-05 15:17 ` Karel Zak
2012-07-12 14:49 ` Karel Zak
2012-07-12 15:01 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-06 23:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 9:19 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 9:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-06 14:20 ` [uml-devel] " Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 7:35 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 7:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 8:45 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 9:22 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2012-06-07 10:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 10:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 10:35 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 10:52 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 13:41 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-06-07 15:18 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 16:37 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 16:32 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 16:50 ` Alan Cox
2012-06-07 16:41 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-06-07 17:26 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120607102228.0ed8281e@bob.linux.org.uk \
--to=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox