From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 10:38:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120608143829.GD1711@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339140698.23343.26.camel@twins>
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can you check the compile error that Dave reported for
> > your patch, because right now Dave is running without it, afaik, due
> > to your lock-instance patch not really working in practice.
>
> Oh, missed that in the thread.. yeah here goes.
>
> Now also compile tested with CONFIG_LOCK_STAT...
Doesn't apply against Linus' current tree.
$ cat ../lock| patch -p1
patching file include/linux/lockdep.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 211.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 254.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 363.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 414.
4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/lockdep.h.rej
patching file include/trace/events/lock.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 61.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 78.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/trace/events/lock.h.rej
patching file kernel/lockdep.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 541.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 556 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 3093.
patch: **** malformed patch at line 268: ck,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-08 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-03 22:36 processes hung after sys_renameat, and 'missing' processes Dave Jones
2012-06-03 22:51 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-03 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-03 23:17 ` Al Viro
2012-06-03 23:28 ` Al Viro
2012-06-03 23:40 ` Al Viro
2012-06-03 23:59 ` Al Viro
2012-06-04 0:07 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06 19:42 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-06 23:00 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-06 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-06 23:54 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 0:29 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-07 0:40 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-07 1:19 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-07 1:29 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 1:31 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-07 1:31 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 1:42 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-07 1:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-07 1:54 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 2:08 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-07 19:36 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 20:43 ` Sage Weil
2012-06-07 23:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-07 23:39 ` Al Viro
2012-06-07 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-08 0:36 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-08 0:59 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 5:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-08 5:48 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 7:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-08 20:20 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 2:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-06-08 2:37 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 2:18 ` Al Viro
2012-06-08 16:22 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-08 17:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-11 12:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-07 1:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-07 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-07 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07 15:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-08 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 14:38 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2012-06-08 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 15:01 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-08 15:21 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-08 14:46 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-08 15:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-11 12:17 ` J. Bruce Fields
2012-06-04 0:00 ` Dave Jones
2012-06-04 0:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-04 0:20 ` Al Viro
2012-06-04 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-04 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07 0:13 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-07 7:07 Miklos Szeredi
2012-06-07 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-11 16:02 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120608143829.GD1711@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox