From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756925Ab2FICX7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:23:59 -0400 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:48663 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755811Ab2FICXc (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:23:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 22:23:26 -0400 From: "Ted Ts'o" To: Chris Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel version numbering plans Message-ID: <20120609022326.GA14153@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ted Ts'o , Chris Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4FD2AA36.5010308@spin.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD2AA36.5010308@spin.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 11:43:18AM +1000, Chris Jones wrote: > What's the plan when we approach kernel version 4.0? > > Will we be moving in to version 4.x or staying in the 3.x numbers > for the time being? The default is that we would stay with 3.x --- I don't see any reason why we would go to 4.x any time in the near future. - Ted