From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754165Ab2FKMI6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:08:58 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:60812 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753613Ab2FKMI5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:08:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:08:27 +0800 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, cjb@laptop.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20120611120820.GN11439@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1338353260-10097-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1338353260-10097-10-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <4FCDDE58.5010501@linaro.org> <20120605102900.GP23408@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FCDE0A4.8070107@linaro.org> <20120605104201.GR23408@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FD5D49C.6070106@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7VkxxUl3xUvPtoxk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD5D49C.6070106@linaro.org> X-Cookie: You are always busy. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 116.228.53.169 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] regulator: Change db8500-prcmu match names to reflect Device Tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --7VkxxUl3xUvPtoxk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On 05/06/12 11:42, Mark Brown wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:34:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > >>Well without it all regulator requests from DT will fail. > >Oh, ffs. Why wasn't this mentioned when the patch was posted, > I did. My 00 patch mentioned that these were all clean-ups/bug fixes > destined for the for RCs. You didn't CC me on that as far as I can tell so I never saw it, and even if you had it's rather burying the lead with a large series of what mostly looks like random cleanups from the bits I see in my archive. I think I assumed another patch in the series changed the names in the device tree or added the device tree. > Nevertheless, these two patches are required for a decent boot. Fail. Well, I guess I'll end up dulplicating the commits :/ --7VkxxUl3xUvPtoxk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP1d9sAAoJEBus8iNuMP3dFB0P/R3mr2AkdROkA1INPdeR5Q/T UOjFK+IWxtTzAt8cl3G8z76MJdQdSxIKrEjn3TXdEGLJzN2bRdDDNqGCX7cgf5Vw 0mnvs0AhxPhBjJhpknYSVSkbWoHy9EKTl1QacLbFYGyFfemHleiLBauPip741TD5 tufTFrZ+Iauw1ARNW7zJ72uQUetCgNa9JNi7B0If+SKyVvaAfwYbU0UroRdpX/Me B0WcjRhB5o/wmOnvJ4J5DPs9rwI53UgKjreJ45haICe5pXxY5Ll84g5eNRXKKJ46 3hnwCdPrjcZEIz5xoeU6Zfvlyjrq1D42xzQBRGkNdL0dPJ+Fp1z6qcoQDbJYPmsd XZQuhW9KEhrBnnMlCtcO5VuNa0dpnGnGXmaQoH3vk4JpSA7sCQ2cVkE3dxWiTUaP NtquAjNnaaLoA5VRIodkscQbJ78ueZVG1bWlp/AxHNlCFEEON8BvzWCvUZlMN6am jMiw0LL4Q+LLn9Ry37fhkkSRJ6Lg4D4FWiuFwJX12lBFjLdas9BoEY8ohH7OJFjD 4x6yPIFLxOK+rN839K1iXvrMhOt4lSi5czJwLfQox8yx/jrJvc8dH3H3NSoHkCyx sAlkS3Y5aR+j+l6ZfWFXh6Hp+cNR5Az1JtXp/HoBOgZKPHaUdB36ShKycCRospRZ 936Efx1b+2+LghvfzCek =y78G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7VkxxUl3xUvPtoxk--