Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some pstore/ramoops fixes

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 06:00:51PM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:06:50AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > In the light of Linus' response, and I said this to Colin already, I'll
> > just zap a prz at boot time for pstore/console interface, which means
> > that nowadays there shouldn't be any objections to this bunch of fixes.
> > 
> > These are valid fixes for v3.5, they restore old pstore's behavior
> > nuances, which I changed accidentaly.
> > 
> > Except for the last patch, which is just a fix I happened to make when
> > I got bored of the warning. :-) Not a regression fix, though.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > ---
> >  fs/pstore/inode.c          |    2 +-
> >  fs/pstore/ram.c            |    3 +++
> >  fs/pstore/ram_core.c       |   27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >  include/linux/pstore_ram.h |    2 ++
> >  4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Have you had a chance to look into these? Plus into
> "[PATCH v5 0/11] Merge ram_console into pstore" series, I believe
> there were no objections as well.

I'm getting there, give me this week to get through them all...