From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Update documentation to cover call_srcu() and srcu_barrier().
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:19:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615201911.GA31184@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339786674-25265-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:57:49AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcubarrier.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcubarrier.txt
> @@ -261,8 +261,10 @@ Answers to Quick Quizzes
>
> Quick Quiz #1: Why is there no srcu_barrier()?
>
> -Answer: Since there is no call_srcu(), there can be no outstanding SRCU
> - callbacks. Therefore, there is no need to wait for them.
> +Answer: There really is an srcu_barrier() now that there is a call_srcu().
> + Before call_srcu(), there were no SRCU callbacks, and there was
> + therefore no need to wait for them, and therefore there was
> + no srcu_barrier().
I don't think it makes sense to leave this question in its current form
and just change the answer. It seems like a trick question now. :)
I'd suggest just dropping the question and renumbering the remaining
questions.
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 18:57 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] rcutorture and documentation patches for 3.6 Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Update documentation to cover call_srcu() and srcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] rcu: Rationalize ordering of torture_ops list Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:21 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] rcu: Test srcu_barrier() from rcutorture test suite Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:25 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] rcu: Fix bug in rcu_barrier() torture test Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 19:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2012-06-15 20:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] rcu: Fix diagnostic-printk typo in rcutorture Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:30 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 18:57 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Make rcutorture fakewriters invoke rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:37 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:52 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 23:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:19 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-06-15 21:16 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] rcu: Update documentation to cover call_srcu() and srcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615201911.GA31184@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox