From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Consolidate tree/tiny __rcu_read_{,un}lock() implementations
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:59:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615205919.GM31184@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339791195-26389-9-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:13:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> The CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU versions of
> __rcu_read_unlock() and __rcu_read_unlock() are identical, so this commit
> consolidates them into kernel/rcupdate.h.
Copy-paste error in the commit message here; the first __rcu_read_unlock
should say __rcu_read_lock. Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 1 +
> kernel/rcupdate.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h | 47 +---------------------------------------------
> kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 47 +---------------------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 2f6ec55..f773a4a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ extern void synchronize_sched(void);
>
> extern void __rcu_read_lock(void);
> extern void __rcu_read_unlock(void);
> +extern void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
> void synchronize_rcu(void);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> index 95cba41..4e6a61b 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,50 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
>
> /*
> + * Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
> + * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
> + * if we block.
> + */
> +void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> +{
> + current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> + barrier(); /* critical section after entry code. */
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
> +
> +/*
> + * Preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
> + * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
> + * rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
> + * invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
> + * in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
> + */
> +void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t = current;
> +
> + if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1) {
> + --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> + } else {
> + barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
> + t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> + barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> + if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
> + rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
> + barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
> + t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
> + }
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> + {
> + int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
> +
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln > INT_MIN / 2);
> + }
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
> +
> +/*
> * Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
> * critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
> * as debug_check_no_locks_held() already does this if lockdep
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> index fc31a2d..a269b0d 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> @@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ static struct rcu_preempt_ctrlblk rcu_preempt_ctrlblk = {
> RCU_TRACE(.rcb.name = "rcu_preempt")
> };
>
> -static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
> static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(void);
> static void rcu_report_exp_done(void);
>
> @@ -527,23 +526,11 @@ void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Tiny-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
> - * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
> - * if we block.
> - */
> -void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> -{
> - current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> - barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutiny.c */
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
> -
> -/*
> * Handle special cases during rcu_read_unlock(), such as needing to
> * notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
> * read-side critical section.
> */
> -static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> +void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> int empty;
> int empty_exp;
> @@ -627,38 +614,6 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Tiny-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
> - * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
> - * rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
> - * invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
> - * in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
> - */
> -void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> -{
> - struct task_struct *t = current;
> -
> - barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_unlock in rcutiny.c */
> - if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
> - --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> - else {
> - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> - barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> - if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
> - rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
> - barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
> - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
> - }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> - {
> - int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln > INT_MIN / 2);
> - }
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
> -
> -/*
> * Check for a quiescent state from the current CPU. When a task blocks,
> * the task is recorded in the rcu_preempt_ctrlblk structure, which is
> * checked elsewhere. This is called from the scheduling-clock interrupt.
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> index 2411000..d806186 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ struct rcu_state rcu_preempt_state = RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER(rcu_preempt);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
> static struct rcu_state *rcu_state = &rcu_preempt_state;
>
> -static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t);
> static int rcu_preempted_readers_exp(struct rcu_node *rnp);
>
> /*
> @@ -233,18 +232,6 @@ void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Tree-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_lock().
> - * Just increment ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, shared state will be updated
> - * if we block.
> - */
> -void __rcu_read_lock(void)
> -{
> - current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
> - barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_lock in rcutree.c */
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_lock);
> -
> -/*
> * Check for preempted RCU readers blocking the current grace period
> * for the specified rcu_node structure. If the caller needs a reliable
> * answer, it must hold the rcu_node's ->lock.
> @@ -310,7 +297,7 @@ static struct list_head *rcu_next_node_entry(struct task_struct *t,
> * notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
> * read-side critical section.
> */
> -static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> +void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> int empty;
> int empty_exp;
> @@ -418,38 +405,6 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
> }
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Tree-preemptible RCU implementation for rcu_read_unlock().
> - * Decrement ->rcu_read_lock_nesting. If the result is zero (outermost
> - * rcu_read_unlock()) and ->rcu_read_unlock_special is non-zero, then
> - * invoke rcu_read_unlock_special() to clean up after a context switch
> - * in an RCU read-side critical section and other special cases.
> - */
> -void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
> -{
> - struct task_struct *t = current;
> -
> - if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting != 1)
> - --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
> - else {
> - barrier(); /* critical section before exit code. */
> - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = INT_MIN;
> - barrier(); /* assign before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
> - if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
> - rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
> - barrier(); /* ->rcu_read_unlock_special load before assign */
> - t->rcu_read_lock_nesting = 0;
> - }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
> - {
> - int rrln = ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting);
> -
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(rrln < 0 && rrln > INT_MIN / 2);
> - }
> -#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__rcu_read_unlock);
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 20:12 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] Fixups for 3.6 Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Fix detection of abruptly-ending stall Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Consolidate duplicate callback-list initialization Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:42 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->qlen accesses Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:45 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Add a gcc-style structure initializer for RCU pointers Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:48 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:50 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Use new INIT_RCU_POINTER for gcc-style initializations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Remove return value from RCU_INIT_POINTER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:50 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/14] key: Remove extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:50 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Remove return value from rcu_assign_pointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:53 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Consolidate tree/tiny __rcu_read_{,un}lock() implementations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:59 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Remove function versions of __kfree_rcu and __is_kfree_rcu_offset Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Make __call_rcu() handle invocation from idle Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:02 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Prevent __call_rcu() from invoking RCU core on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:04 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Split RCU core processing out of __call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:25 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Fix rcu_is_cpu_idle() #ifdef in TINY_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:28 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:05 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:40 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Fix detection of abruptly-ending stall Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615205919.GM31184@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox