public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->qlen accesses
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:24:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615222442.GO2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120615204500.GH31184@leaf>

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:45:00PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 01:13:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> > 
> > The _rcu_barrier() function accesses other CPUs' rcu_data structure's
> > ->qlen field without benefit of locking.  This commit therefore adds
> > the required ACCESS_ONCE() wrappers around accesses and updates that
> > need it.
> 
> This type of restriction makes me wonder if we could add some kind of
> attribute to fields like qlen to make GCC or sparse help enforce this.

It is worth thinking about.  Should spark some spirited discussions.  ;-)

> > ACCESS_ONCE() is not needed when a CPU accesses its own ->qlen, or
> > in code that cannot run while _rcu_barrier() is sampling ->qlen fields.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

Thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> >  kernel/rcutree.c |    8 ++++----
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index d938671..cdc101e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp,
> >  		rsp->qlen += rdp->qlen;
> >  		rdp->n_cbs_orphaned += rdp->qlen;
> >  		rdp->qlen_lazy = 0;
> > -		rdp->qlen = 0;
> > +		ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) = 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -1597,7 +1597,7 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
> >  	}
> >  	smp_mb(); /* List handling before counting for rcu_barrier(). */
> >  	rdp->qlen_lazy -= count_lazy;
> > -	rdp->qlen -= count;
> > +	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) -= count;
> >  	rdp->n_cbs_invoked += count;
> >  
> >  	/* Reinstate batch limit if we have worked down the excess. */
> > @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu),
> >  	rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> >  
> >  	/* Add the callback to our list. */
> > -	rdp->qlen++;
> > +	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen)++;
> >  	if (lazy)
> >  		rdp->qlen_lazy++;
> >  	else
> > @@ -2420,7 +2420,7 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
> >  	rdp->grpmask = 1UL << (cpu - rdp->mynode->grplo);
> >  	init_callback_list(rdp);
> >  	rdp->qlen_lazy = 0;
> > -	rdp->qlen = 0;
> > +	ACCESS_ONCE(rdp->qlen) = 0;
> >  	rdp->dynticks = &per_cpu(rcu_dynticks, cpu);
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks->dynticks_nesting != DYNTICK_TASK_EXIT_IDLE);
> >  	WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&rdp->dynticks->dynticks) != 1);
> > -- 
> > 1.7.8
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 20:12 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/14] Fixups for 3.6 Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Fix detection of abruptly-ending stall Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/14] rcu: Consolidate duplicate callback-list initialization Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:42     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/14] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->qlen accesses Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:45     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:24       ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/14] rcu: Add a gcc-style structure initializer for RCU pointers Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:48     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:22       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:50       ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:47         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/14] rcu: Use new INIT_RCU_POINTER for gcc-style initializations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/14] rcu: Remove return value from RCU_INIT_POINTER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:50     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/14] key: Remove extraneous parentheses from rcu_assign_keypointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:50     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/14] rcu: Remove return value from rcu_assign_pointer() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:53     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Consolidate tree/tiny __rcu_read_{,un}lock() implementations Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:59     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/14] rcu: Remove function versions of __kfree_rcu and __is_kfree_rcu_offset Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 20:59     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/14] rcu: Make __call_rcu() handle invocation from idle Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:02     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/14] rcu: Prevent __call_rcu() from invoking RCU core on offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:04     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/14] rcu: Split RCU core processing out of __call_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:25     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:13   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/14] rcu: Fix rcu_is_cpu_idle() #ifdef in TINY_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:28     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:57       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:05         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 20:40   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/14] rcu: Fix detection of abruptly-ending stall Josh Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120615222442.GO2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox