From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:44:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615224445.GB5226@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339794370-28119-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:01PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
>
> In order to allow each RCU flavor to concurrently execute its rcu_barrier()
> function, it is necessary to move the relevant state to the rcu_state
> structure. This commit therefore moves the rcu_barrier_cpu_count global
> variable to a new ->barrier_cpu_count field in the rcu_state structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> kernel/rcutree.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
> kernel/rcutree.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 2cfbdb8..d363416 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,6 @@ unsigned long rcutorture_vernum;
>
> /* State information for rcu_barrier() and friends. */
>
> -static atomic_t rcu_barrier_cpu_count;
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
> static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
>
> @@ -2267,9 +2266,12 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu)
> * RCU callback function for _rcu_barrier(). If we are last, wake
> * up the task executing _rcu_barrier().
> */
> -static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
> +static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
> {
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
> + struct rcu_data *rdp = container_of(rhp, struct rcu_data, barrier_head);
> + struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
> +
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
> complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> }
>
> @@ -2281,7 +2283,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
> struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
> struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
>
> - atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
> + atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
> rsp->call(&rdp->barrier_head, rcu_barrier_callback);
> }
>
> @@ -2294,9 +2296,9 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> int cpu;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct rcu_data *rdp;
> - struct rcu_head rh;
> + struct rcu_data rd;
>
> - init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh);
> + init_rcu_head_on_stack(&rd.barrier_head);
>
> /* Take mutex to serialize concurrent rcu_barrier() requests. */
> mutex_lock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
> @@ -2321,7 +2323,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> * us -- but before CPU 1's orphaned callbacks are invoked!!!
> */
> init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> - atomic_set(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count, 1);
> + atomic_set(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count, 1);
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
> rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = current;
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
> @@ -2360,15 +2362,16 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp);
> rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = NULL;
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
> - atomic_inc(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count);
> + atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
> smp_mb__after_atomic_inc(); /* Ensure atomic_inc() before callback. */
> - rsp->call(&rh, rcu_barrier_callback);
> + rd.rsp = rsp;
> + rsp->call(&rd.barrier_head, rcu_barrier_callback);
>
> /*
> * Now that we have an rcu_barrier_callback() callback on each
> * CPU, and thus each counted, remove the initial count.
> */
> - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rcu_barrier_cpu_count))
> + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
> complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
>
> /* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */
> @@ -2377,7 +2380,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> /* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
> mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
>
> - destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rh);
> + destroy_rcu_head_on_stack(&rd.barrier_head);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index 1783eae..e7d29b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -386,6 +386,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
> struct task_struct *rcu_barrier_in_progress;
> /* Task doing rcu_barrier(), */
> /* or NULL if no barrier. */
> + atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */
> raw_spinlock_t fqslock; /* Only one task forcing */
> /* quiescent states. */
> unsigned long jiffies_force_qs; /* Time at which to invoke */
> --
> 1.7.8
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-15 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-15 21:05 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Improvements to rcu_barrier() and RT response on big systems Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Size rcu_node tree from nr_cpu_ids rather than NR_CPUS Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:47 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:17 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 9:17 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 14:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 14:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 20:31 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Prevent excessive line length in RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:48 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:08 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Move _rcu_barrier()'s rcu_head structures to rcu_data structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:19 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:44 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:51 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:55 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Increasing rcu_barrier() concurrency Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:31 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-16 0:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 0:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add tracing for _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Add rcu_barrier() statistics to debugfs tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:38 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Remove unneeded __rcu_process_callbacks() argument Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:37 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Introduce for_each_rcu_flavor() and use it Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:52 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:35 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:59 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 5:22 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 6:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 0:02 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 0:04 ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 1:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:43 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120615224445.GB5226@leaf \
--to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox