linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
	niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
	dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion to rcu_state structure
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:51:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120615225130.GC5226@leaf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339794370-28119-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 02:06:02PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> 
> In order to allow each RCU flavor to concurrently execute its
> rcu_barrier() function, it is necessary to move the relevant
> state to the rcu_state structure.  This commit therefore moves the
> rcu_barrier_completion global variable to a new ->barrier_completion
> field in the rcu_state structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>

>  kernel/rcutree.c |    9 ++++-----
>  kernel/rcutree.h |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index d363416..a946437 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ unsigned long rcutorture_vernum;
>  /* State information for rcu_barrier() and friends. */
>  
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex);
> -static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion;
>  
>  /*
>   * Return true if an RCU grace period is in progress.  The ACCESS_ONCE()s
> @@ -2272,7 +2271,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
>  	struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp;
>  
>  	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
> -		complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> +		complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2322,7 +2321,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	 * 6.	Both rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks are invoked, awakening
>  	 *	us -- but before CPU 1's orphaned callbacks are invoked!!!
>  	 */
> -	init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> +	init_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion);
>  	atomic_set(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count, 1);
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
>  	rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = current;
> @@ -2372,10 +2371,10 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>  	 * CPU, and thus each counted, remove the initial count.
>  	 */
>  	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count))
> -		complete(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> +		complete(&rsp->barrier_completion);
>  
>  	/* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */
> -	wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion);
> +	wait_for_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion);
>  
>  	/* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */
>  	mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex);
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> index e7d29b7..56fb8d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
>  						/* Task doing rcu_barrier(), */
>  						/*  or NULL if no barrier. */
>  	atomic_t barrier_cpu_count;		/* # CPUs waiting on. */
> +	struct completion barrier_completion;	/* Wake at barrier end. */
>  	raw_spinlock_t fqslock;			/* Only one task forcing */
>  						/*  quiescent states. */
>  	unsigned long jiffies_force_qs;		/* Time at which to invoke */
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-15 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 21:05 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Improvements to rcu_barrier() and RT response on big systems Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:05   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Size rcu_node tree from nr_cpu_ids rather than NR_CPUS Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:47     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:37       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:17         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:38           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  9:17             ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16 14:44               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 14:51                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16 20:31                   ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Prevent excessive line length in RCU_STATE_INITIALIZER() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:48     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:05   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Place pointer to call_rcu() in rcu_data structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:08     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Move _rcu_barrier()'s rcu_head structures to rcu_data structures Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:19     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_cpu_count to rcu_state structure Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:44     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:51     ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_mutex " Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 22:55     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: Increasing rcu_barrier() concurrency Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:31     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:21       ` Steven Rostedt
2012-06-16  0:49         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  0:48       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add tracing for _rcu_barrier() Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:35     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] rcu: Add rcu_barrier() statistics to debugfs tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:38     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Remove unneeded __rcu_process_callbacks() argument Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:37     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Introduce for_each_rcu_flavor() and use it Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:52     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  1:01       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:35         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:36           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Use for_each_rcu_flavor() in TREE_RCU tracing Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 23:59     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:56       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  5:22         ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  6:42           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:06   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-16  0:02     ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  0:04       ` Josh Triplett
2012-06-16  1:04         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-15 21:43   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] rcu: Control RCU_FANOUT_LEAF from boot-time parameter Josh Triplett
2012-06-15 22:10     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120615225130.GC5226@leaf \
    --to=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).